Hypertext::non-Hypertext not URL::URN

Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com> Fri, 02 January 1998 18:03 UTC

Delivery-Date: Fri, 02 Jan 1998 13:03:17 -0500
Return-Path: owner-uri@Bunyip.Com
Received: from ns.cnri.reston.va.us (cnri []) by ns.ietf.org (8.8.7/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id NAA04986 for <ietf-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Jan 1998 13:03:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from services.bunyip.com (services.Bunyip.Com []) by ns.cnri.reston.va.us (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id NAA09529; Fri, 2 Jan 1998 13:06:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by services.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA16434 for uri-out; Fri, 2 Jan 1998 12:53:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by services.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA16427 for uri-in; Fri, 2 Jan 1998 12:53:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mocha.bunyip.com (mocha.Bunyip.Com []) by services.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA16419 for <uri@services.bunyip.com>; Fri, 2 Jan 1998 12:53:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by mocha.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA24865 for uri@services; Fri, 2 Jan 1998 12:53:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM []) by mocha.bunyip.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA24862; Fri, 2 Jan 1998 12:53:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from casablanca.parc.xerox.com ([]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <53355(2)>; Fri, 2 Jan 1998 09:53:18 PST
Received: from parc.xerox.com ([]) by casablanca.parc.xerox.com with SMTP id <71811>; Fri, 2 Jan 1998 09:53:07 PST
Message-ID: <34AD297F.15D39C63@parc.xerox.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 1998 09:53:03 -0800
From: Larry Masinter <masinter@parc.xerox.com>
Organization: Xerox PARC
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: michaelm@rwhois.net
CC: paf@swip.net, fielding@kiwi.ics.uci.edu, harald.t.alvestrand@uninett.no, moore@cs.utk.edu, uri@Bunyip.Com, urn-ietf@Bunyip.Com
Subject: Hypertext::non-Hypertext not URL::URN
References: <199801021703.MAA09409@bailey.dscga.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-uri@Bunyip.Com
Precedence: bulk


I think you've made an important point that I don't want to
get lost. The syntax forms that are controversial
(fragment identifiers, relative forms, query syntax)
are part of the application of HYPERTEXT.

In fact, whether or not you want those forms seems to depend
entirely on whether or not you think you're doing hypertext.

The distinction between having them and not seems to have
little to do with whether or not the identifiers are "location
independent". If you want a resource locator but you're
not doing hypertext (e.g., the resources that you're locating
are printers for IPP or servers for service location or whatever)
then the relative, query, and fragment forms are not applicable.

If you ARE doing hypertext, then those forms are useful,
even if you believe the identifiers are permanent, location
independent, and have all of the attributes that are intended
for URNs and not for URLs.

"Uniform Resource Identifiers" define a space of fully qualified,
non annotated names, while "hypertext references" imbue some
semantics to the internal syntax of URIs (namely, give significance
to "/" and "?" within Uniform Resource Identifiers), add a new
syntactic element ("#" fragment identifiers), and add a new protocol
element (relative identifiers).