Re: [saag] trans meeting at IETF-93

Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> Thu, 23 July 2015 08:51 UTC

Return-Path: <benl@google.com>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4CD71A86F7 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 01:51:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ts-yC8Ox28Dy for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 01:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yk0-x22a.google.com (mail-yk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93B691A802E for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 01:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ykax123 with SMTP id x123so214737607yka.1 for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 01:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=Ca3OzDyAEYfbhoWfsMQVsGQDCUPrJdj92AlJrm50maA=; b=HS9XVvZUNLtMGqAO2dpYMqMTOLxYFpF7sXaUt69UUwJM8k3SkPSZFbxbo6horruyGJ V7X3lMn442LFAonsG42QxtmyLNa/CmGtF7vihiagl+5j4KGRiUbz+i2DnnIUnHIBE5Dn TCqbkmO0K2wCDgJaBtDKwwFi8ExUnYa2TlafQHxob0sQVLU1BYgpv0mVO8bpPt8JvC23 E2yoEnNjPbnDeRyRfICHXSUvxPz7BWo7sM2odICdRGRlGhp5FPkk8PacU9XANbbn47FE 57O+Vi2UeDHULSG0GMZPK/0Ol40bfFxeFQcTbqe1G9P567EkZL5mGRNENwGXjqo5pWHf owsQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=Ca3OzDyAEYfbhoWfsMQVsGQDCUPrJdj92AlJrm50maA=; b=j41zKeGXrUzt0XWxJ2Jxe8+Dq6LibeJGKi4ooYL3zavd5hk/TevgdAAzQztC6Fjmwd VGxzFI8Nlun70sHDrpjVKVYmnyJjqL4dilFFTgZKwmrvOmCn/EMR4mYdf9UtzmZP0OuU CMfHtSkPHHusBuUCBVZCApCR6tYB+NOR0swKy8U7KT0wD23eW1oZhGjv6dHYL2cS6iDe dALiecVSAWpyNjmywThtq4y5G2rucixOcAmgxkcnpAOG4X63sc/oMbmVfHViqLgh8jaC eCdGi9KZSsgxjXnv61Oc/XMs5xG6WEkGZl8semkcg5rb/a2POnjjA3gywA976E7vfDJe mD7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkeEOvgwT3DrLSsmBkFBjr6TvWyhM5UT8b1qGOK5jKdrNGdyGPQuo8pQ95cEMy6BMWWXjw0
X-Received: by 10.170.216.194 with SMTP id i185mr7121213ykf.80.1437641460986; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 01:51:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <55B09B76.4070701@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <55B09B76.4070701@redhat.com>
From: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 08:50:51 +0000
Message-ID: <CABrd9SRiBrjgjaugwWdUjpxc8p6r41xG7UeDCTd1hx=yA3g9gQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Wouters <pwouters@redhat.com>, saag@ietf.org, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1139fce498e4a4051b86fc73"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/4hx96m5ZrWNiVw35dTkXV7zbQN8>
Subject: Re: [saag] trans meeting at IETF-93
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 08:51:05 -0000

On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 at 08:45 Paul Wouters <pwouters@redhat.com> wrote:

>
> As per tradition, trans will only be meeting after saag at 17.40 in the
> Grand Hilton Ballroom
>
> The 6962-bis document is nearing completion and we plan to do a WGLC on it
> sometime in the
> next couple of weeks.
>

I should note that Google intends to create a reference implementation of
6962-bis (work is under way currently) and we recommend WGLC does not
happen until that work is complete.


>
> We adopted a threat model document that is ready for more reviews. Work on
> the CT gossip
> protocol is proceeding a little slower than we had hoped, although it has
> the advantage
> that it can still incorporate changes based on the new threats doccument.
>
> The CT binaries draft has not seen many changes, and needs a bit more
> exposure before doing
> a WGLC on it.
>
> There is interest from multiple people to pick up from the original proof
> of concept of CT for DNSSEC.
>
> Paul
>
> _______________________________________________
> saag mailing list
> saag@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag
>