[saag] DOTS WG Summary from IETF 103
Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Thu, 08 November 2018 04:44 UTC
Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE44130DFF for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 20:44:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ijUSY_K2FWEj for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 20:44:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from veto.sei.cmu.edu (veto.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A5221276D0 for <saag@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 20:44:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from delp.sei.cmu.edu (delp.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.31]) by veto.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id wA84iBnB007492 for <saag@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 23:44:11 -0500
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 veto.sei.cmu.edu wA84iBnB007492
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1541652251; bh=rgTU+wWkfbqMCeRydFu2MNcpgvuInf3qbFC+urRoDz0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=DPJ5LwYz5j6cEL02W3Q/2g7BRTiVQy5jdzsiwPhYn0HtPe6zG8xNzWGowMXU29Zzn wpXQg5PW0ezcS2jZ/lOuMGu25Vri0fyp3yIjmUYkkShoec3gQdYe9G1svvrv5OgHKN 3WmKK3S2kstRk2qj7nFa5x5BrgClhoy+xb6y3QDs=
Received: from CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cassina.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.249]) by delp.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id wA84i9oQ031255 for <saag@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 23:44:09 -0500
Received: from MARATHON.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.250]) by CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.249]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 23:44:09 -0500
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: DOTS WG Summary from IETF 103
Thread-Index: AdR3Ha+jtsQutNnCTeO+v7aJ/5ZWtQ==
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 04:44:08 +0000
Message-ID: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC0181A4AEDF@marathon>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.22.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/BIfY5hLOc-YQiv7zKi8z0aiWB_A>
Subject: [saag] DOTS WG Summary from IETF 103
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 04:44:18 -0000
The DOTS WG met on Thursday morning. The WG heard the results of the fourth interoperability test conducted at the Hackathon. With many of the currently chartered milestones in WGLC [4][5] or submitted for publication [1][2][3], new work was introduced. Two new use cases [6][7] proposed extensions to the signal channel; and a standardized server discovery mechanism [8] and implementation guidance in multi-homed environments [9] were proposed. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dots-requirements/ [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dots-signal-channel/ [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dots-data-channel/ [4] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dots-use-cases/ [5] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dots-architecture/ [6] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-reddy-dots-home-network/ [7] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-h-dots-mitigation-offload-expansion/ [8] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-dots-server-discovery [9] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-dots-multihoming
- [saag] DOTS WG Summary from IETF 103 Roman Danyliw