[saag] another conflict review of some GOST stuff
Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 10 December 2015 01:16 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D1621A802D for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 17:16:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fh6zPcLJkm0n for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 17:16:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B50C1A8029 for <saag@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 17:16:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40741BE5C for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 01:16:34 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mxfIIg9Y4yQL for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 01:16:32 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.0.10.19] (unknown [212.76.224.242]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CAE71BE5B for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 01:16:31 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1449710192; bh=IS15ywMqIfRHLWKv4c+fut0qoA0x8w7jIJFrMapd7tc=; h=To:From:Subject:Date:From; b=rAks8BRPAL6E/kFJ50feK9myGMKl+pkE45yjDlqrcYtscEuFIEBvXctWR4Gro6f3b x3pqc5B22hkrm2B8rnDZM4xz++jRyZXGcpkobPsYptSjp5y0IVXjjKpt3h2yjCwN1T S8ij3X3Lrv+ZCnNmlpYmXLRWheByBGXREyTZz5qA=
To: "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <5668D26F.2020200@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 01:16:31 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/E8icM-Ak-wJnnqtG4t6I8bujxiI>
Subject: [saag] another conflict review of some GOST stuff
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 01:16:38 -0000
Hiya, On Dec17, the IESG will also be doing the conflict review for a draft [1] that documents some more about using GOST algorithms. Since we've typically handled national algorithms in this manner (basic alg details are documented as independent submission stream RFCs) I think this one does not represent a conflict with ongoing IETF work or process. But if I'm wrong, please do let me know. Should someone want code points for using these algorithms in IETF protocols, that'd of course go through the normal consensus process. See RFC 5742 [2] for details of what this bit of process is about. If you have comments on the draft content then please send those to the authors and cc the independent submissions editor, Nevil Brownlee (rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org). Cheers, S. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-smyshlyaev-gost-usage/ [2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5742
- [saag] another conflict review of some GOST stuff Stephen Farrell
- Re: [saag] another conflict review of some GOST s… Stephen Farrell
- [saag] another conflict review of some GOST stuff Tero Kivinen
- Re: [saag] another conflict review of some GOST s… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [saag] another conflict review of some GOST s… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [saag] another conflict review of some GOST s… Dmitry Belyavsky
- Re: [saag] another conflict review of some GOST s… Tero Kivinen
- Re: [saag] another conflict review of some GOST s… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [saag] another conflict review of some GOST s… Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev
- Re: [saag] another conflict review of some GOST s… Paul Lambert
- Re: [saag] another conflict review of some GOST s… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [saag] another conflict review of some GOST s… Dan Harkins
- Re: [saag] another conflict review of some GOST s… Paul Wouters
- Re: [saag] another conflict review of some GOST s… Stephen Farrell