Re: [saag] should we revise rfc 3365?

[Joe Touch <[e-mail]>]

FYI - see attached notice for the port-use doc in TSVWG.

Joe

On 5/23/2012 5:56 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
>
>
> On 5/23/2012 4:51 PM, Mouse wrote:
>>> Short version: go read [RFC 3365] and say if you think it needs an
>>> update.
>>
>> Yes, but I believe it's not one you're willing to accept.
>>
>>> "MUST implement strong security in all protocols"
>
> To open a can of worms, this would also be a good doc in which to
> discuss the need for secure ports, and whether (or not) to ever assign
> meaning to the difference between system and user ports...
>
> I was hoping to potentially open those discussions on TSVWG regarding
> the user-ports draft, but it might also be relevant here. I'm not sure
> if either will come to conclusion, but a round of discussion seems in
> order.
>
> Joe

--- Begin Message ---

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Transport Area Working Group Working Group of the IETF.

	Title           : Recommendations for Transport Port Uses
	Author(s)       : Joe Touch
	Filename        : draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-use-00.txt
	Pages           : 11
	Date            : 2012-05-30

   This document provides recommendations to application and service
   designers on how to use the transport protocol port number space to
   help in its preservation. **NOTE THAT THIS CURRENT VERSION IS
   LARGELY AN OUTLINE OF ISSUES**.


A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-use-00.txt

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-use-00.txt

The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-use/

--- End Message ---