[saag] NEA WG report

Stephen Hanna <shanna@juniper.net> Tue, 28 July 2009 20:21 UTC

Return-Path: <shanna@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: saag@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F144E3A6919 for <saag@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:21:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.486
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.486 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.113, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V4VFlhVLkKfH for <saag@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:21:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og119.obsmtp.com (exprod7og119.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.16]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F1773A685B for <saag@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:21:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob119.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKSm9dukDbscvW4dCuCkk/RcDSPzje/5O5@postini.com; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:21:14 PDT
Received: from p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.25) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.375.2; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:16:04 -0700
Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::c126:c633:d2dc:8090%11]) with mapi; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:16:04 -0400
From: Stephen Hanna <shanna@juniper.net>
To: "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:15:35 -0400
Thread-Topic: NEA WG report
Thread-Index: AcmsH8hXHsgwY+dwSw2KhPdJ5ABQdAAqbGlgGL0rjFA=
Message-ID: <AC6674AB7BC78549BB231821ABF7A9AE8E76EF2D15@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [saag] NEA WG report
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/saag>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:21:14 -0000

The NEA WG met on Monday afternoon.

We have two drafts with the IESG: draft-ietf-nea-pa-tnc-04.txt
and draft-ietf-nea-pb-tnc-04.txt. We reviewed the comments
received during IETF Last Call and from the ADs. Proposals
for resolving these comments were presented and discussed.
No substantial disputes came up so the editors will proceed
with the changes discussed, as well as any others required
to address IESG requests. Since the changes are not entirely
trivial, we'll do another WGLC on the specs once they have
been revised to make sure there is WG consensus on the changes.

We also reviewed draft charter changes that add a new work
item: specifying one or more Posture Transport protocols
(PT) to transport the higher layer protocols (PA and PB).
We do not plan to define a new transport protocol. Rather,
we will define how the PB protocol should be carried over
existing standard transport protocols like EAP and/or TLS.
As with PA and PB, the plan is to solicit proposals for PT
that meet our requirements (described in RFC 5209). There
was agreement in the room and from our AD on these charter
changes and they had already been favorably reviewed on
the WG list so we will send them to the IESG for approval.