[saag] kitten WG status for IETF 96
Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU> Wed, 20 July 2016 16:23 UTC
Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF94812D195 for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.508
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.508 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ETs6-7l9muGe for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-2.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-2.mit.edu [18.9.25.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E36012B05E for <saag@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 1209190d-30bff70000002dac-2e-578fa583d90c
Received: from mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.35]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 12.22.11692.385AF875; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 12:23:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-1.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id u6KGNVsI028755 for <saag@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 12:23:31 -0400
Received: from multics.mit.edu (system-low-sipb.mit.edu [18.187.2.37]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id u6KGNSHT021392 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <saag@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 12:23:30 -0400
Received: (from kaduk@localhost) by multics.mit.edu (8.12.9.20060308) id u6KGNRoh004151; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 12:23:27 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 12:23:27 -0400
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU>
To: saag@ietf.org
Message-ID: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1607200955110.5272@multics.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (GSO 962 2008-03-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrMIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixCmqrNuytD/c4HuPlMWU/k4mB0aPJUt+ MgUwRnHZpKTmZJalFunbJXBlTGufxVJwgq/i9IllbA2Mn7i7GDk5JARMJKZdesLexcjFISTQ xiTRueo0K4RzlFFiz/kmJpAqIYFrTBLHr1tBJBoYJSY1v2MBSbAIaEu0vlwMZrMJqEjMfLOR DcQWERCUeNA3CSwuLKAqcb15CTOIzSvgILFx30owW1RAR2L1/iksEHFBiZMzn4DZzAJaEsun b2OZwMg7C0lqFpLUAkamVYyyKblVurmJmTnFqcm6xcmJeXmpRbpGermZJXqpKaWbGMFhI8m7 g/HfXa9DjAIcjEo8vBEH+8KFWBPLiitzDzFKcjApifKqivaGC/El5adUZiQWZ8QXleakFh9i lOBgVhLhlV/cHy7Em5JYWZValA+TkuZgURLn3f6tPVxIID2xJDU7NbUgtQgmK8PBoSTBW7YE qFGwKDU9tSItM6cEIc3EwQkynAdo+ASQGt7igsTc4sx0iPwpRkUpcd58kK0CIImM0jy4XnBc 72ZSfcUoDvSKMO9ekHYeYEqA634FNJgJaPAcAbDBJYkIKakGxltPpr4M4GM7tJb7Q88p5klr n3IJnHbWKuQ0WPZ38/spgf4s7S1NARv15ocHLJgo7yQgeadMomH2Tg/b5qCEJyHK1/XuaYiy XJsvsoT74P3Ejx/3Bh6/HnkuOea0Y0ysbUt9esyq5qSY2h/M54vLdD+xbnkatS24fXHnXQG5 /YxJU4rLtrabKLEUZyQaajEXFScCAF4r8/HGAgAA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/fy_xPq0DGa0M6whLcN7baBZPDZk>
Subject: [saag] kitten WG status for IETF 96
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 16:23:37 -0000
Kitten is not meeting in Berlin.
Since Buenos Aires, we have had one document advance to IETF LC
(draft-ietf-kitten-aes-cts-hmac-sha2); the WG is happy with it but the
secdir reviewer would have preferred different choices for the crypto and
that thread is not fully resolved yet.
Another draft, draft-ietf-kitten-pkinit-freshness, is on its way to the
IESG pending a shepherd writeup.
In an attempt to mitigate low working group energy, we have decided to
adopt a new scheme for obtaining and tracking document reviews, instead of
the traditional WGLC period before advancing documents to the IESG.
We'll still get document reviews on the mailing list, but we'll also have
a wiki page per document where the chairs (or other participants) will put
links to the review thread, along with which version of the document was
reviewed and any administrative comments about it. Once the chairs feel a
document has gotten enough review, we'll let the WG list know we plan to
move it forward and start working on the shepherdd writeup right away,
without a fixed wait period for objections. This way the reviews don't
all need to come in during a small time window of WGLC.
We hope that this scheme will help us clear the backlog of WG documents
we've accumulated, documents that ought to get published but are in some
sense "insufficiently interesting" to have people championing them and
keeping them moving.
Documents "ready for WGLC" that are good candidates for this experiment
include:
draft-ietf-kitten-krb-auth-indicator
draft-ietf-kitten-gssapi-extensions-iana
draft-ietf-kitten-sasl-saml-ec
draft-ietf-kitten-rfc6112bis (once a new revision gets posted; currently
waiting for approval)
draft-ietf-kitten-pkinit-alg-agility
draft-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis
draft-ietf-kitten-iakerb
-Ben
- [saag] kitten WG status for IETF 96 Benjamin Kaduk