Re: [saag] advice on key table YANG module

I'd be willing to hel with the work related to RFC 7210 if that is the one that will move forward.

Russ

On Oct 26, 2015, at 5:28 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:

> 
> Hi all,
> 
> If folks have input to offer on this one I'm sure the authors
> would appreciate that.
> 
> Thanks,
> S.
> 
> On 15/10/15 18:03, Ing-Wher Chen wrote:
>> Dear Security ADs,
>> 
>> Currently, RTGWG is trying to define a key management YANG module.
>> There are two competing key management YANG modules, one organizes
>> keys into key chains [1], and the other organizes keys as a key table
>> [2] based on RFC 7210 [3].  Several implementations take the first
>> approach, the key chain approach, and they were developed long before
>> the publication of RFC 7210.
>> 
>> I was wondering if there is a need to continue both key-chain and
>> key-table YANG modules in parallel?  More specifically, is there a
>> need to continue to work on the key-table YANG module?
>> 
>> Thanks, Helen
>> 
>> [1]
>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-rtg-yang-key-chain/>
>> 
>> [2]
>> <http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-rtgwg-key-table-yang/>
>> 
>> [3] <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7210>
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> saag mailing list
> saag@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag