Re: [saag] a few new algs and a bunch of deprecation

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 11 November 2015 19:00 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC2F1B382D for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:00:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WXpGycuow09B for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:00:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 378881B382C for <saag@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:00:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wmvv187 with SMTP id v187so70162635wmv.1 for <saag@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:00:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=gR66D+UdmGywjymPD6Mau+G+4Ci5RSC/n7d94pbvLIM=; b=Qbv7SQj+X1kSqyeGDO1uJXS0QqjqtAPzq0oYcfGY4BHJEKQVYuczXxwWYsC/uAOIw2 2CSGjpeRHhxoyHebRqVoryE+NAGSQKBfOh2Buj4iyNOtunYtsdYc7rfYuChvApKsRKqy LJm0iNTKkWBo7kMYVYyEvyfIA2vJeSNf360vjqGclkgO2Ux+2kV+uM/34cIgaTro+wPx mdQpT4zL2Zr4spTDIYTwb4lO1BY6xE+N3uU/XLXpj1WVgpZKHB4Rj5ndxdXLTCpYUkR7 l/iQNFtSKVFqcSVAsG4M9L5G5oeodj8W70H1C//iU7juIdVIlqo4X/kUKsZVGMmWcFCK skNQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.190.19 with SMTP id gm19mr13593178wjc.0.1447268422767; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:00:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.28.52.82 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:00:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20151110153349.60826d1c@latte.josefsson.org>
References: <56398CBD.9050109@cs.tcd.ie> <87y4ebzb57.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <563C83BC.2030903@cs.tcd.ie> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1511070106060.26829@multics.mit.edu> <5641C55B.4040803@cs.tcd.ie> <87ziymui9z.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <5641F732.8030600@cs.tcd.ie> <EE1D3A18-5F0A-4937-9571-C4F8ED4EB0F6@gmail.com> <20151110153349.60826d1c@latte.josefsson.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 14:00:22 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH4uxgd+hc3vqipFRsPHV9Gz1xa0u4+ioo7CC52UOibSbw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/oKRr004Vsv-bilFg9dW2DffhAhQ>
Cc: Security Area Advisory Group <saag@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [saag] a few new algs and a bunch of deprecation
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 19:00:26 -0000

I do think having this in a WG would be helpful to get the right set
of eyes on drafts that may span several areas.

A draft that was just posted to the JOSE list could possibly be done
in this new group:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/jose/fADOQ-T_fWySMnRbe5QkTqPX7-E

Kathleen

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> wrote:
>> Are there any candidate drafts now?
>
> The IPSECME WG have accepted a document on key agreement.  The TLS WG
> (which spawned the CFRG discussion) accepted key agreement, and the
> latest WG document RFC 4492bis discuss signatures although I don't
> recall any consensus call about adding that. The OpenPGP WG have EdDSA
> signatures. The further non-WG documents I can recall now include:
>
> SSH
> ---
>
> ed25519 sign
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bjh21-ssh-ed25519-02
>
> curve25519+curve448 kex:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-josefsson-ssh-curves-00
>
> missing: ed448
>
> PKIX
> ----
>
> Curve25519+Curve448 namedCurve:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-josefsson-pkix-newcurves
>
> EdDSA Ed25519(ph) and Ed448(ph)
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-josefsson-pkix-eddsa-04
>
> DNS
> ---
>
> Ed25519:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sury-dnskey-ed25519-03
>
> Ed448:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sury-dnskey-ed448-00
>
> JSON
> ----
>
> There is an unpublished proposal floating around.
>
> /Simon
>
> _______________________________________________
> saag mailing list
> saag@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag
>



-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen