[saag] MILE repot@IETF104
"Takeshi Takahashi" <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp> Wed, 27 March 2019 16:16 UTC
Return-Path: <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>
X-Original-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: saag@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BBD41202FC for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 09:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hwgzf0wPBAUi for <saag@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 09:16:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns1.nict.go.jp (ns1.nict.go.jp [IPv6:2001:df0:232:300::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA07120283 for <saag@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 09:16:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gw1.nict.go.jp (gw1.nict.go.jp [133.243.18.250]) by ns1.nict.go.jp with ESMTPS id x2RGGqrX065792 for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 01:16:52 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail2.nict.go.jp (mail2.nict.go.jp [133.243.18.15]) by gw1.nict.go.jp with ESMTP id x2RGGqJh065777 for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 01:16:52 +0900 (JST)
Received: from LAPTOP9DLCDU5S (ssh1.nict.go.jp [133.243.3.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.nict.go.jp (NICT Mail Spool Server2) with ESMTPSA id D2347113EC for <saag@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2019 01:16:51 +0900 (JST)
From: Takeshi Takahashi <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>
To: saag@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 01:16:54 +0900
Message-ID: <000e01d4e4b8$7ecbfc40$7c63f4c0$@nict.go.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000F_01D4E503.EEB44080"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdTkt1XrV8+SU67KTUi6UZTzT2UiTw==
Content-Language: ja
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.101.1 at zenith1m8
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/s468uFCCTNNTpyGpLqaJj-Br3H8>
Subject: [saag] MILE repot@IETF104
X-BeenThere: saag@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Advisory Group <saag.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/saag/>
List-Post: <mailto:saag@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/saag>, <mailto:saag-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 16:16:55 -0000
MILE met at IETF104 at 11:20 on Tuesday. There were about 10-15 attendees in the room. We have discussed the progress of the following three WG drafts. 1. Xmpp-grid [1] (under IESG reviews): We discussed whether to keep the draft as a proposed standard document and agreed to do so. 2. JSON IODEF [2] (WGLC completed): We discussed the pros and cons of creating an IANA repository and decided not to create one for the draft. 3. CSIRT ROLIE [3] (Adopted as a WG document): We discussed whether to divide the document into two separate documents, and agreed to keep it a signle document. Additionally, new draft on ROLIE Vulnerability Extension [4] was discussed, and several people agreed to provide review comments. Changes to the current milestone was discussed and agreed. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mile-xmpp-grid/ [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mile-jsoniodef/ [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mile-rolie-csirt/ [4] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-banghart-mile-rolie-vuln/
- [saag] MILE repot@IETF104 Takeshi Takahashi