Re: [sacm] Hackathon Planning for IETF 100

Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com> Fri, 04 August 2017 11:26 UTC

Return-Path: <adam.w.montville@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1268C126CC4 for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 04:26:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BR6ze0ljOsAu for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 04:26:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x22a.google.com (mail-it0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B047131D31 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Aug 2017 04:26:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id v127so6976206itd.0 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 04:26:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=nkYAsqdxvJxR/FYxJ2niFiOSwmlwEI2pvTHtRbNbg3o=; b=Ir0zWzzAgTFS64QJ08SCGF38tGSsnIDCcOIH1fIsA5gRK+crqnZ9zRC+nPwZozcikK G3Nb0gsyZ/qnDr79SDg/lxycT0V9JrkSXJOzqaCYQ5TQmExvNcXXlrrh0Vicp35HjEMB XZ6PhHjvYpBvrk7ri3cScfM7EhpkbxcKsVqyOYIcuJQr/pBfLf+gimDvRv9UuzPgcYgd v0ujf20ILoECqrtZQuLVQDPBJ04McF3nj8tU3CpVQi5uGRSReR6riNcOWVVTRwvkACtW /OmUCcPXNxOLJZteemCCsggkCa0aJVceId5XItAOvuh/I10Ysp5Kr0HvFQUlRPfw3nMo m6ZA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=nkYAsqdxvJxR/FYxJ2niFiOSwmlwEI2pvTHtRbNbg3o=; b=pKxUzr246DNnMQDMMFAWwJzuOMXG1oLqMMuF5ubXPJLIg5P+j4gnDyJYCO/9Vp9nVU TbHXYNbeIIQC9tZ1lXZrS1L9JmJK2zMcTjUwTBJv5B7Pyg+RisFiqLD9eNVLUTFMMFWw 5icV6GQejgDMJ+6SLVYgi7rFAEMJVCpHgVB4KmO3xp6PF4bq4oPe7B1WuDit7hoyPLd7 8zkQBQRmfFenDlrRfkVHzJ26DWaFacfqj7CJDl36JhNDll8nmtcMaAnhiUsGhY47Dvef 3jJKGrBxLl0qELhXMCLq+vRT7uN6rsmikTsQXmMEOcJOKVcmIgPM1vx2AFvPhHPh7cPT 4ePw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5j/qWRbXa5bRB+DtOGk8cJqYtctsqNpCpvHPnRg0kVhSV461mVn ULcTzQ/0TneEU5xSaN50AlSFXzjVbR2z
X-Received: by 10.36.36.202 with SMTP id f193mr1745964ita.37.1501845961311; Fri, 04 Aug 2017 04:26:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACknUNVg+dE_m+kY-CYVOHmBCwqJ8aRcWG3c_=5zTbE6MxPw2w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACknUNVg+dE_m+kY-CYVOHmBCwqJ8aRcWG3c_=5zTbE6MxPw2w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 11:25:50 +0000
Message-ID: <CACknUNU9bU6MXZccDuLzgMM4XsLpUNeE03Hmk1D+vRik689Oug@mail.gmail.com>
To: "sacm@ietf.org" <sacm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1147bc98080bb40555ebc311"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/0m7uD3RF8w8_ptLcS4N99MUeZTE>
Subject: Re: [sacm] Hackathon Planning for IETF 100
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2017 11:26:04 -0000

Ping :-)

I'll ping again in a week or two, so let's plan to start regular meetings
in late August or (at the latest) early September.


On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:45 AM Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com>
wrote:

> All:
>
> After our successful hackathon efforts at IETF 99, we would like to plan
> for another, follow-on hackathon effort at IETF 100. The goal would be to
> merge the two related IETF 99 efforts (see
> https://github.com/sacmwg/vulnerability-scenario/tree/master/ietf_99_hackathon
> ).
>
> To this end, I think we should begin by establishing a regular meeting
> cadence, similar to what we did in preparation for IETF 99. This time,
> however, we could attempt one or two 30-minute meetings once per week.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Karen pointed out that we may have more significant logistical challenges
> with this hackathon, as Singapore may be a harder destination for folks to
> reach. We'll work through it, and the challenge may end up working in our
> favor.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Adam
>