IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sacm] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-16: (with COMMENT)

"Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <ncamwing@cisco.com> Mon, 26 June 2017 00:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ncamwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170011200FC; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 17:21:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id izagmHJaxwXH; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 17:21:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2522612762F; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 17:21:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1868; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1498436504; x=1499646104; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=2XOxGO31qFBItKO0BXKRgT80Fk+qf6zxi9ivjVdqbRQ=; b=iNsULb4CbsZya6qBawBFfvZC/1m8K9YLn9FouA30AqKqOLQNpYHWN/83 0gsVTQqhy9noad4pkz6euDKBOTD2eCGZL9dR4P0ZbumuJYHtZNCL1Dkxd FHl0RM/AAaqPSy11MhHg5BRWYU86I4QS13Jq90YNnuTDzbxbBEhiFHtbd o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DuAAAXU1BZ/51dJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgystYoENB4NlihmRPZYcghEshXgCGoJuPxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUZBiMRRRACAQgODAImAgICMBUQAgQBDQWKLBCxToImi08BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEYBYELghyFWAuCboQ7EgEcgxMwgjEFiVOVFgKHMowzggmFSIpBiSqLdgEfOH8LdBVbAYUvgU12AYcAgSOBDQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,393,1493683200"; d="scan'208";a="440640137"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Jun 2017 00:21:28 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (xch-rtp-012.cisco.com [64.101.220.152]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v5Q0LSag023123 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 26 Jun 2017 00:21:28 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 20:21:27 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Sun, 25 Jun 2017 20:21:27 -0400
From: "Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <ncamwing@cisco.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-sacm-requirements@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sacm-requirements@ietf.org>, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>, "sacm-chairs@ietf.org" <sacm-chairs@ietf.org>, "sacm@ietf.org" <sacm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-16: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHS6f20Dn+8dkUnVEqFnvQl0VGsdqI2HgUA
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 00:21:27 +0000
Message-ID: <C12019BA-CD8B-4633-8514-831C1A63B510@cisco.com>
References: <149798789771.25060.10459570190959496080.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <149798789771.25060.10459570190959496080.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1a.0.160910
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.86.253.68]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <ED7DAB38297D7B4BA3B212A60F935C07@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/29KN2Kr5IJF6vvpU_uL2DrogQtI>
Subject: Re: [sacm] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-16: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 00:21:46 -0000

Thanks Eric, I’ve made that update in the rev -17

	-Nancy
On 6/20/17, 12:44 PM, "Eric Rescorla" <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

    Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for
    draft-ietf-sacm-requirements-16: No Objection
    
    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    introductory paragraph, however.)
    
    
    Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
    for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
    
    
    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sacm-requirements/
    
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    COMMENT:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        *  Large datagrams: It is possible that the size of posture
           assessment information can vary from a single assessment that is
           small in size to a very large datagram or a very large set of
           assessments (up to multiple gigabytes in size).
    
    I would consider saying "message" here, because I usually think of "datagram"
    as ~= packet/IP datagram.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email