[sacm] GitHub Issue Tracking: 2015-08-07

["Adam W. Montville" <[e-mail]>]

Hi.

I’ve updated our GitHub issue tracking here: https://tools.ietf.org/wg/sacm/trac/wiki/SacmGitHubIssueStats <https://tools.ietf.org/wg/sacm/trac/wiki/SacmGitHubIssueStats>.  There are four outstanding issues [1][2][3][4] for the Requirements draft, which we were hoping to get into WGLC soon.  

It seems that [1] requires a few other reviewers.  If you have five minutes, please review the following text taken from the Requirements draft and comment on [1]:

DM-006  Provider Identification: The interfaces and actions in the
    data model MUST include the ability to identify data from a specific
    provider.  For example, a SACM consumer should be able to request
    all data to come from a specific provider (e.g.  Provider A) as
    there can be a larger set of providers.

[2] and [3] appear to be nits for the draft authors to fix.

[4] poses a question about whether the Requirements draft should address privacy considerations.  If you have a minute, please review the thread at [4] and opine.  If you’re further inclined, offer some suggestions for improvement (i.e. provide text, even if it’s just a start at something).

Thanks for your time today - hope you all have a great weekend!

Adam


[1] https://github.com/sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-requirements/issues/59 <https://github.com/sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-requirements/issues/59>
[2] https://github.com/sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-requirements/issues/58 <https://github.com/sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-requirements/issues/58>
[3] https://github.com/sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-requirements/issues/57 <https://github.com/sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-requirements/issues/57>
[4] https://github.com/sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-requirements/issues/55 <https://github.com/sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-requirements/issues/55>