IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sacm] Initial comments on ECP draft

Andreas Steffen <andreas.steffen@strongswan.org> Fri, 11 August 2017 18:37 UTC

Return-Path: <andreas.steffen@strongswan.org>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC860132190 for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 11:37:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HNjn_BUySobW for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 11:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.strongswan.org (sitav-80046.hsr.ch [152.96.80.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A856131CEA for <sacm@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 11:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.10.1.15] (46-126-238-39.dynamic.hispeed.ch [46.126.238.39]) by mail.strongswan.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C876400CA; Fri, 11 Aug 2017 20:38:05 +0200 (CEST)
To: Jessica Fitzgerald-McKay <jmfmckay@gmail.com>, Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com>, "sacm@ietf.org" <sacm@ietf.org>
References: <CACknUNUvUDdiEOrmvuep4ji8jBJ+KkGO1vyNVG8bZrirYTzFAQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAM+R6NUAk=b79A-Vr8a8L0atqPjNLYTgY52Nz69e6nvOvH1pzA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andreas Steffen <andreas.steffen@strongswan.org>
Message-ID: <598DF96A.3000408@strongswan.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 20:37:30 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAM+R6NUAk=b79A-Vr8a8L0atqPjNLYTgY52Nz69e6nvOvH1pzA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms090204060208040605010605"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/4fAhE3wiC-Z3U7EOq_d-S6faHA4>
Subject: Re: [sacm] Initial comments on ECP draft
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2017 18:37:38 -0000

Hi Jess,

of course the IF-IMC and IF-IMV interfaces were used to exchange
SWIMA messages between the SWIMA collector and the PB-TNC client
as well as between SWIMA verifier and the PB-TNC server.

Regards

Andreas

On 11.08.2017 19:38, Jessica Fitzgerald-McKay wrote:
> We put IF-IMC and IF-IMV on hold during the SWIMA work. We could revive
> that effort, but I would like to be sure there is interest from the
> group before doing so. IF-IMC and IF-IMV improve coordination of
> communication between collectors and client, and between verifiers and
> servers, respectively. They have been implemented in strongSwan, so were
> likely a part of the hackathon effort at IETF 99. Andreas, am I correct
> there?

======================================================================
Andreas Steffen                         andreas.steffen@strongswan.org
strongSwan - the Open Source VPN Solution!          www.strongswan.org
Institute for Networked Solutions
University of Applied Sciences Rapperswil
CH-8640 Rapperswil (Switzerland)
===========================================================[INS-HSR]==

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email