IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology] Consider bringing back "Network Address" (#89)

adammontville <notifications@github.com> Wed, 04 April 2018 13:53 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-495d-sacm=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 838F1126BF7 for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 06:53:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.464
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.464 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 54k9OecDEIdX for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 06:53:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o6.sgmail.github.com (o6.sgmail.github.com [192.254.113.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01E6E1204DA for <sacm@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 06:53:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=MEcYusyZnqW3VohUqvjooqflukU=; b=GW7vdsTkm86Pq6PG GQczyTaPkdB/xX78xuhcMi6qulrSM488VE8LiTeT9e1yr58+m8kVOJX1GAxap3Pv u+g6VzoYl+NanGV6YkD55WVX6a9nRkxwDw5GlubWh7loe1qJGlJlyMuEwQNXEO5v j5C6zFyu72RCNa2Szc96GeL9OQ0=
Received: by filter0629p1iad2.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0629p1iad2-32146-5AC4D8CB-4D 2018-04-04 13:53:15.735815207 +0000 UTC
Received: from smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) by ismtpd0006p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id VEUEusd5R067NrTOGj2QUg for <sacm@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 13:53:15.871 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 13:53:15 +0000
From: adammontville <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology <reply+00a6c4d1bcf5ac05a2e84f1a81509b5b9ed05b52379b521f92cf0000000116dc9acb92a169ce1270cd00@reply.github.com>
To: sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology <draft-ietf-sacm-terminology@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology/issues/89/378607560@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology/issues/89@github.com>
References: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology/issues/89@github.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ac4d8cb9f8c8_23442aeea5f88ec833418a"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: adammontville
X-GitHub-Recipient: sacm
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: sacm@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: UtArl2HfP/Y+1oZ8SNY9H5Pr0ZOxPj1bwUo/acMKCsq7+VGI/Wu08+1+LJuQZltEuixbvJZhvBourL +Y4Ag44AiAYKDiGtY370ZdWQblhVl1M8jh/bO5NVP06iVRoKy0yCANFfiwJUAtWoo0I74OOurRnkdN 63kCdRmvUtSpAJB4wEEkcA9l+2iYnNu4JjFfDD+mt3eUjEevlbbdyNAS9A==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/62q3BFWqIUu2QWOMHG5c-WLMu4c>
Subject: Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology] Consider bringing back "Network Address" (#89)
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 13:53:18 -0000

That's a good question, Jarrett. To me, we don't need to bring this back.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology/issues/89#issuecomment-378607560

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email