IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)

cabo <notifications@github.com> Wed, 14 October 2020 11:20 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C999F3A0475 for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 04:20:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.208
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.208 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 33i6wBlSpbmo for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 04:20:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-18.smtp.github.com (out-18.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC31B3A0407 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 04:20:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github.com (hubbernetes-node-eaeaa25.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.114.25]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A9983340E4A for <sacm@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 04:20:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1602674427; bh=DrTfi+vIjP7nLJE0iTVVB9QaxUsM57u8GPtRJ9wOKBE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=scGUKUfNYOEC1V3M/7Zmr0g0G+aI0ObSWSip3iW+KNfteyzGk2IG6sWL4GyWtYKmJ F72nGYNqx3ecJ5OapFoeSIUgxHwh75NnsSDulwQm6BeJtoriO/Dsn+ecA/MYEmU9pW 2ll1FVGpE00CN8oRek26LtOSMgylsKP7jGLKfvpM=
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 04:20:27 -0700
From: cabo <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid <reply+ACTMJUKPYZZBKRRW3AAYZEV5SK77XEVBNHHCV7W7PY@reply.github.com>
To: sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid <draft-ietf-sacm-coswid@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid/issues/29/708337213@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid/issues/29@github.com>
References: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid/issues/29@github.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f86defba4d84_5a19b42310df"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: cabo
X-GitHub-Recipient: sacm
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: sacm@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/6KuVgdgibuNRLRhD6Ew7Tvr5sGQ>
Subject: Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] can't use CDDL to validate seemingly valid CBOR (#29)
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 11:20:30 -0000

>From a tool perspective, I think having a map with both a catch-all like that provided in global-attributes and an extensible socket like `* $$coswid-extension` in a single map can be problematic even if the order is fixed: extensions not known will then turn up in global-attributes, known extensions in $$coswid-extension, which may or may not be what the application expects.  


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid/issues/29#issuecomment-708337213

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email