[sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology] Terminology reconciliation (#91)
Henk Birkholz <notifications@github.com> Mon, 11 June 2018 11:51 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14A4130F9D for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 04:51:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LWVFSLn46SU6 for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 04:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-4.smtp.github.com (out-4.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3FDA130FA2 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jun 2018 04:51:30 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 04:51:29 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1528717889; bh=QVqpmsm0/J3I7bEvyIRXp+up04Gz0yuiEIS6q6UkJBQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:Subject:List-ID:List-Archive:List-Post: List-Unsubscribe:From; b=kKKVGPH0ZKP3SsBZlngaQdUdaNe7EVz0AhAagpskhXGbSf6ox5STC73fA+C7YwVrt yKkmIngFfl6+xntUnx9gVfnGu5Z5+mVOqH7ZHegYq8bhj6BwrvCwTP84Fga1c3vDFQ M4VOfzXVlVOh0T1a+DxdgOJUiyQuhYFGkX2jF354=
From: Henk Birkholz <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology <reply+00a6c4d1605af340691ce1373446ebbe00129f3ffe17e14492cf000000011736244192a169ce13bd0cb4@reply.github.com>
To: sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology <draft-ietf-sacm-terminology@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology/pull/91@github.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b1e6241bd8ae_48b53f9bed70af80118386"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: henkbirkholz
X-GitHub-Recipient: sacm
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: sacm@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/8rKSx3VpcVh9Std5jmtA2XT4p0I>
Subject: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology] Terminology reconciliation (#91)
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 11:51:33 -0000
In order to update the current draft (which will expire soon), I would propose to pull the current reconciliation version into master and prepare a commit (so we do not submit in the last minute). You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at: https://github.com/sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology/pull/91 -- Commit Summary -- * Removed orphan paragraph * Addressed several minor issues * trimmed down Hardware Component (#87) * Addresed the definition of timestamp * multiple fixes to broken structure, fixed duplicated change log entry 12-2-13 (how did this happen anyways? Please never alter a change log entry of a previous submit), updated draft according to the Terminology Reconciliation project -- File Changes -- M draft-ietf-sacm-terminology.md (83) -- Patch Links -- https://github.com/sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology/pull/91.patch https://github.com/sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology/pull/91.diff -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology/pull/91
- Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology] T… Henk Birkholz
- [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology] Termi… Henk Birkholz