Re: [sacm] [draft-ietf-sacm-architecture] Figure 1- Simple Architecture Model - Regression (#32)
henkbirkholz <notifications@github.com> Fri, 24 July 2015 09:26 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACCAC1A882D for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:26:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.941
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.941 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, GB_I_LETTER=-2, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_12=2.059, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xa1phqC5k67m for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext1.iad.github.net [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4190F1A6EE7 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 02:26:28 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1437729988; bh=8pTr+RncEmSZfmBtu+qBmImGbPsz7YIesGr/4pnyg6Y=; h=From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=nZCpR7B+DzEhYADPQtaPy2I3rLZ42C3Hw0Kt5FErOqpxSABYi9AXNdHERVQCbrrl3 HlJUAgM1OuSL1OhD37cDtmBkOabzclWwmKw4UGS/wG0noM15aqX4kXC4Q1zGCxAF0O GrhAK2L2PsMVidysd3q2jKsATcre+nCggj//Mtzo=
From: henkbirkholz <notifications@github.com>
To: sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-architecture <draft-ietf-sacm-architecture@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-architecture/issues/32/124454718@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-architecture/issues/32@github.com>
References: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-architecture/issues/32@github.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_55b204c476a6b_53d53fefad3a52a0128522b"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: henkbirkholz
X-GitHub-Recipient: sacm
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: sacm@ietf.org
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/AUPtHxLRLl9wsTSn2MvWw68rPLg>
Subject: Re: [sacm] [draft-ietf-sacm-architecture] Figure 1- Simple Architecture Model - Regression (#32)
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Reply-To: sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-architecture <reply+00a6c4d175dc909fe849f96736c5717f79a85f30a2b5399892cf0000000111c9c6c492a169ce05c84431@reply.github.com>
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 09:26:30 -0000
As an additional very minor detail, Pr (or another two letter abbrevation) instead of P could be used for Provider to make it a little more consistent. --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-architecture/issues/32#issuecomment-124454718
- Re: [sacm] [draft-ietf-sacm-architecture] Figure … henkbirkholz
- Re: [sacm] [draft-ietf-sacm-architecture] Figure … Jim Schaad