Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] Update draft-ietf-sacm-coswid.md (PR #55)

cabo <notifications@github.com> Thu, 23 February 2023 17:14 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02CA2C15154C for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 09:14:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.086
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.086 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rf0yfnh0dudJ for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 09:14:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-19.smtp.github.com (out-19.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04D53C15C510 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 09:14:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from github-lowworker-d1fc117.ash1-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-d1fc117.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.22.62]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DDA5E03FC for <sacm@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 09:14:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1677172454; bh=rf1cGu0if+R62wZbTQe2ctefkUoa7jWr4UauKJSn3ok=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=nsKlHEN4G0CFo4Tw79hJDUGCXmcUhJeP69lc8OlovkcbBvOx+F0hFCrTjogdHK/52 Cze8jPfwhI0FVfAudNayHyWbr0F9LDrGkYzMKa6OYotzx2J4BQ99+b/pYJrX42tl+F aCBRPWIcXOxHgYERPMrj5zh22QPgveb6EM2njvlU=
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 09:14:14 -0800
From: cabo <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid <reply+ACTMJUMMNS5ME6757R5TDHWCATIWNEVBNHHF6MZDZQ@reply.github.com>
To: sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid <draft-ietf-sacm-coswid@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid/pull/55/review/1311776565@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid/pull/55@github.com>
References: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid/pull/55@github.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_63f79ee64f088_48e3c5bc50275"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: cabo
X-GitHub-Recipient: sacm
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: sacm@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/GB7upfIzUoq6RwA0O_dhIq0D0pY>
Subject: Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] Update draft-ietf-sacm-coswid.md (PR #55)
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 17:14:25 -0000

@cabo commented on this pull request.



> @@ -1095,7 +1095,13 @@ The values above are registered in the IANA "Software ID Link Use Values" regist
 
 # swid and swidpath Expressions
 
-This specification defines the following expressions for use in CoSWID and to provide interoperability with schemes used in {{SWID}}. Because both the "swid" and "swidpath" schemes are to be interpreted within a local, rather than a global, context, neither of these scheme are URIs as defined in {{RFC3986}} and the swid and swidpath scheme names are not registered as permanent schemes with IANA. That noted, swid and swidpath expressions conform to all rules for URI syntax. All uses of these expressions encountered within a CoSWID are to be interpreted as described in this section.
+This specification defines the following schemes for use in CoSWID and to provide interoperability with schemes used in {{SWID}}. 
+Because both the "swid" and "swidpath" schemes are to be interpreted within a local (rather than a global) context, neither of these are technically URI schemes as defined in {{RFC3986}}.
+For this reason, the swid and swidpath scheme names are registered with IANA as provisional, rather than permanent, schemes. 
+However, registering these schemes as provisional ensures that the schemes are reserved and that they are properly defined going forward. 

s/schemes/scheme names/g

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid/pull/55#pullrequestreview-1311776565
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid/pull/55/review/1311776565@github.com>