IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology] Propose to remove (or redefine) Statement (#72)

Henk Birkholz <notifications@github.com> Fri, 08 June 2018 12:06 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C07F130E88 for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 05:06:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jCZQhV81smZj for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 05:06:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBA16130E83 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 05:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2018 05:06:19 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1528459579; bh=NTeeSbsXLPgfYfLj/9V7T4EFSBnTdJka5SK7Ct/AEwI=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=nmylufE7MyiyUKMy1riQZbd+FfJMFmBKNKI/5pLSSYH2qxCAiBvqBF/tNykFbxo4a wd9FHI142gejfzzNNaRUilwYwis9x0PXYUtiPoqupmYfxLKsMUaALAacZaTuGdTBo2 TFCa1nfMVrTNoA3Vf+5HSf8AeNkZmfX4wwkpRQZU=
From: Henk Birkholz <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology <reply+00a6c4d1c9d59255df5a20981e9e6195c69ff52464c0498b92cf000000011732333b92a169ce10bcf7d7@reply.github.com>
To: sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology <draft-ietf-sacm-terminology@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology/issues/72/395740936@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology/issues/72@github.com>
References: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology/issues/72@github.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b1a713b7743_66573fbed82a8f8813591d"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: henkbirkholz
X-GitHub-Recipient: sacm
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: sacm@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/Qhkri87j9aDWoYZ8P_qL23y4c-c>
Subject: Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology] Propose to remove (or redefine) Statement (#72)
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2018 12:06:22 -0000

I think the problem is that there are both Statement and SACM statement defined in the document. I am not sure if that was the initial reason to open this issue and maybe the source of my confusion.

My proposal is to remove the existing definition of SACM Statement and relabel Statement to SACM Statement.

Would this address this issue appropriately?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-terminology/issues/72#issuecomment-395740936

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email