IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sacm] Poll for virtual interim during week of 24 June

Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de> Tue, 04 June 2019 17:30 UTC

Return-Path: <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 930711200D5 for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 10:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YZSXqJ_vGEiG for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 10:30:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailext.sit.fraunhofer.de (mailext.sit.fraunhofer.de [141.12.72.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEDD112004A for <sacm@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 10:30:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sit.fraunhofer.de (mail.sit.fraunhofer.de [141.12.84.171]) by mailext.sit.fraunhofer.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id x54HUEKv012852 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 4 Jun 2019 19:30:15 +0200
Received: from [192.168.0.4] (95.91.230.210) by mail.sit.fraunhofer.de (141.12.84.171) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 19:30:09 +0200
To: Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>, "sacm@ietf.org" <sacm@ietf.org>
References: <AF60D51B-310C-4DB1-BEB1-A0F7AE3A172D@isoc.org>
From: Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>
Message-ID: <48627eaf-9c89-4840-ca56-88f6766e1a00@sit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 19:30:08 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AF60D51B-310C-4DB1-BEB1-A0F7AE3A172D@isoc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: [95.91.230.210]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/RthqeYcIao8YK9AwL_1QIHkUutk>
Subject: Re: [sacm] Poll for virtual interim during week of 24 June
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 17:30:22 -0000

+1, that is pretty much the best week

On 6/4/19 4:19 PM, Karen O'Donoghue wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> Chris and I are considering a virtual interim the week of 24 June. What is people’s availability during that week?
> 
> Regards,
> Karen
> _______________________________________________
> sacm mailing list
> sacm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email