IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sacm] [draft-ietf-sacm-requirements] Do we need a privacy section (#55)

Jim Schaad <notifications@github.com> Fri, 07 August 2015 21:38 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84A0B1A0119 for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 14:38:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id armXMK4Hq_yA for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 14:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext4.iad.github.net [192.30.252.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8F391A010C for <sacm@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 14:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 14:38:01 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1438983481; bh=b1mZfe9OM85fFBOQTQxxcxoYN39WkK65dh7QA50wkNg=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Dzo47b2cqThnV732cXnPzBwO4GbwHhZ7ANvp5kQSBALVqcbqL2m8hzZXeReU8stTJ hQSnAqbUTKk4Bp1XqLY5taDKmcVLt4Mk6++l1wFt7URz9eVFzaf+9KocFr0bSk8C4X jhIIQtC8YQAX+myq4G3odbQCZUkzIeHjoCpyVwyU=
From: Jim Schaad <notifications@github.com>
To: sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-requirements <draft-ietf-sacm-requirements@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-requirements/issues/55/128838977@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-requirements/issues/55@github.com>
References: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-requirements/issues/55@github.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_55c5253976895_668d3fa734a532bc913c"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: jimsch
X-GitHub-Recipient: sacm
X-GitHub-Reason: comment
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: sacm@ietf.org
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/YWr8qjsIipOTEzTFFM0pY_iSDqk>
Cc: sacm <sacm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sacm] [draft-ietf-sacm-requirements] Do we need a privacy section (#55)
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Reply-To: sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-requirements <reply+00a6c4d14bbfd36e4f73e33ad0dde968da8a378b1ae0e21392cf0000000111dce73992a169ce05cd0b75@reply.github.com>
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 21:38:04 -0000

Adam,

While it is true that we are focused on the single enterprise systems.  I will be shocked if there are not third parties that will offer to do the monitoring on my behalf.  This means that they are going to have to ability to look not only at the systems and users in my enterprise, but potentially compare them against systems and users in other enterprises.  

Also, although we are looking at single enterprise systems, my ISP is a single enterprise and can do the monitoring against me and anybody in my enterprise.

---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-requirements/issues/55#issuecomment-128838977

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email