Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] Missing hash description in resource-collection (#28)

Henk Birkholz <notifications@github.com> Wed, 28 October 2020 12:57 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D483A0F3A for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 05:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16=1.092, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5i0LhqcFM5pQ for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 05:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-28.smtp.github.com (out-28.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 979D23A00E3 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 05:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github.com (hubbernetes-node-e778d48.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.109.55]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DBD2A9026B0 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 05:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1603889858; bh=klonF8GjPysjk12ilYhrsk4Z53/npxbmeoc4ul74Bsw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=AEbSxHCzWFf8oHzAKC3oz5BAIC5UWMJOvRmuBKs2v/WCaxw5yAowkwpEhREke3MQ3 VA7O0loJFkgb7Z+gmSQwBMVRJ4c+7rlJF9sF9QAc6qtCq1W+IkXpw25wv7BhAbr1Sk jvv1lyV7+m9e1dUWnS/W6NBy95PPRK+2rZN3zX7w=
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 05:57:38 -0700
From: Henk Birkholz <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid <reply+ACTMJUN5W4HJB6CYTGEC5NF5UVF4FEVBNHHCVYRDDQ@reply.github.com>
To: sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid <draft-ietf-sacm-coswid@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid/issues/28/717914680@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid/issues/28@github.com>
References: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid/issues/28@github.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f996ac2d4f00_5119b41364c0"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: henkbirkholz
X-GitHub-Recipient: sacm
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: sacm@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/qZZ_mu3iXZp16Fj5fBR3lrY1RBo>
Subject: Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid] Missing hash description in resource-collection (#28)
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 12:57:41 -0000

It is described in 2.9.1 just before resource-collection. This includes the "code point" and the definition of index 7.

Is your proposal to merge 2.9.1 into 2.9.2? At the moment, I think being next to each other could satisfy the requirement of "relevant bits are tightly packed".

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-coswid/issues/28#issuecomment-717914680