Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-information-model] remove the terms identification, identity, identifying (#21)

Henk Birkholz <notifications@github.com> Thu, 06 April 2017 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B48129535 for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.518
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.518 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A2u8bHAZxox4 for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:38:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2-ext8.iad.github.net [192.30.252.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B72BF129531 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 08:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 08:38:03 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1491493083; bh=AXdrPhkB0FzMHj+3Jb1icdGoRD3BLhVzauGQFr+g9sE=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=DvzpBrtNNu+4dyH08y5Jxu9MtM2/eJ60MDGMTiGVMveL6ep4PfMF2wxO3XBHrav/R XK2S7Rw2UjWO81CWuagSr36pVn7SZpghf67nTww8Ofx9fRykLZtxZh1D6lu2mH5A7y fKBEQiPfnxdPTz3c4Vf+X4ErxIBnKOKFNYtjUu68=
From: Henk Birkholz <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-information-model <reply+00a6c4d12735800f0c3c125b253aaf3366a3e4a5b4995fd192cf0000000114fe22db92a169ce05dd98e9@reply.github.com>
To: sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-information-model <draft-ietf-sacm-information-model@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-information-model/issues/21/292213678@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-information-model/issues/21@github.com>
References: <sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-information-model/issues/21@github.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_58e660db14351_19443fbfdb125c3461866"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: henkbirkholz
X-GitHub-Recipient: sacm
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: sacm@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/tL4kscnlnOQYkZzRUZmOq9LWMYY>
Subject: Re: [sacm] [sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-information-model] remove the terms identification, identity, identifying (#21)
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 15:38:08 -0000

Thank you for the pointer.

I will not be the show stopper here, but would like to add that every vendor that contributed to SACM at some point was in favor to avoid the terms identity and identification (as a result (identifying) attributes are aggregated in a TE characterization record that can be matched with classification profiles). I am okay with keeping text simple and conclusive and not to "make the process of thinking about the document harder".

We have to make sure that identification is not a gateway/step towards to track individuals.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/sacmwg/draft-ietf-sacm-information-model/issues/21#issuecomment-292213678