[salud] (no subject)
worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Fri, 29 March 2013 19:39 UTC
Return-Path: <worley@shell01.TheWorld.com>
X-Original-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2529D21F8E49 for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 12:39:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.103
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.115, BAYES_00=-2.599, MISSING_SUBJECT=1.762, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uf86myDvFZwH for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 12:39:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls6.std.com [192.74.137.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43AC021F890F for <salud@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 12:39:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell.TheWorld.com (root@shell01.theworld.com [192.74.137.71]) by TheWorld.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r2TJdBeo013754; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 15:39:13 -0400
Received: from shell01.TheWorld.com (localhost.theworld.com [127.0.0.1]) by shell.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id r2TJdAiM1419947; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:39:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from worley@localhost) by shell01.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id r2TJdAr81421114; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 15:39:10 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 15:39:10 -0400
Message-Id: <201303291939.r2TJdAr81421114@shell01.TheWorld.com>
From: worley@ariadne.com
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
To: Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com>
In-reply-to:
Cc: salud@ietf.org
Subject: [salud] (no subject)
X-BeenThere: salud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sip ALerting for User Devices working group discussion list <salud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/salud>
List-Post: <mailto:salud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 19:39:44 -0000
(laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com) Subject: Re: [salud] Updates to section 6 References: <201303280039.r2S0deO01302294@shell01.TheWorld.com> <51546450.5010306@alum.mit.edu> <CACWXZj2c2XMyc-zSXtQyHATc4D9YdEDQyyXWrawZEAwLTYZcJw@mail.gmail.com> --text follows this line-- [as an individual] > From: Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com> > > The "locale:country:<ISO 3166-1 country code> " seems to be some kind of > different and difficult. > > Now that we have the "private-name " stuff working fine, why not use it for > country specific tones? Instead of "urn:alert:locale:country:de:foo:bar" > we would have "urn:alert:foo@de:bar". Or is something wrong with it? E.g., <urn:alert:service:call-waiting@de> That is an interesting idea. But we have a lot of apparatus regarding <private-name>s, so we would either need to make an exception for domains that contained only one label, or to designate some organization that is responsible for each country-TLD. > From: Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com> > > However, in this specification we don't define or register any particular > national tone, we expect national companies or organisations and national > standardization bodies to do it. We could require anybody who defines > national tones to be owner of a subdomain of the respective country code > top level domain which he must use as <provider-id> for the tone. In many > cases, national tones are defined by big phone companies anyway. Fortunately, the "locale" URNs don't describe sensory aspects of signals but semantic ones. So while <urn:locale:country:de> indicates that the signal should be rendered using German conventions, each device interprets those conventions separately. In practice, I don't think the "locale" URNs will get a great deal of use, because in many cases one UA will not know if another UA implements any particular "locale" URN. Dale
- [salud] (no subject) Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] (no subject) Laura Liess