Re: [SAM] what's the difference between Application-layer multicast and overlay multicast?

Yangwoo Ko <newcat@icu.ac.kr> Thu, 20 July 2006 04:17 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G3Pyt-0005YJ-FU; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:17:47 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G3Pyr-0005Ib-Sy for sam@irtf.org; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:17:45 -0400
Received: from sniper.icu.ac.kr ([210.107.128.51]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G3Pyq-000288-1D for sam@irtf.org; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:17:45 -0400
Received: (snipe 22086 invoked by uid 0); 20 Jul 2006 13:17:40 +0900
Received: from newcat@icu.ac.kr with Spamsniper 2.96.00 (Processed in 0.012544 secs);
Received: from unknown (HELO ?220.69.185.49?) (Z?f?own@220.69.185.49) by unknown with SMTP; 20 Jul 2006 13:17:40 +0900
X-RCPTTO: lin_longxin@126.com, sam@irtf.org
Message-ID: <44BF03DC.8060507@icu.ac.kr>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 13:17:32 +0900
From: Yangwoo Ko <newcat@icu.ac.kr>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Forest.Lin" <lin_longxin@126.com>
Subject: Re: [SAM] what's the difference between Application-layer multicast and overlay multicast?
References: <38adbecd0607191546h1e3a4737r23b132061d3075e9@mail.gmail.com> <200607201207378595640@126.com>
In-Reply-To: <200607201207378595640@126.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 4d87d2aa806f79fed918a62e834505ca
Cc: sam <sam@irtf.org>
X-BeenThere: sam@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "For use by members of the Scalable Adaptive Multicast \(SAM\) RG" <sam.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sam>, <mailto:sam-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/sam>
List-Post: <mailto:sam@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sam-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sam>, <mailto:sam-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: sam-bounces@irtf.org

http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/06jul/slides/SAMRG-0.pdf

Forest.Lin wrote:
> Hi, everyone,
>  
>     I have a basic question as the subject. Could you give me some 
> correct conceptions? thxs!
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Forest.Lin
> 2006-07-20
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *发件人:* Yuji -UG- Imai
> *发送时间:* 2006-07-20 06:47:23
> *收件人:* xcast@wide.ad.jp; xcast@fan.club.uec.ac.jp; xcast@ai3.net; 
> sam@irtf.org
> *抄送:*
> *主题:* [SAM] Planned changes for XCAST6 version 2
>  
> Hi,  all.
>  
>    Here  I  attach  the  slides  "XCAST6  v2  changes".
>  
>  As  draft-ooms-xcast-basic-spec-09.txt  have  worked  stably
> for  6  years,  we  believe  we  can  prove  the  concept  of  eXplicit
> Multi-Unicast.  On  the  other  hands,  we  receive  feedback
> especially  for  semi-permeable  tunnel  part  of  IPv6  version.
>  
> So,  we  decide  it  is  good  time  to  tune  up  the  protocol  and
> re-start  novel  experiments  on  it.
>  
> We  appreciate  you  would  take  a  look  and  comment.
>  
> Thank  you.
> --  
> ug
>  
> _______________________________________________
> SAM  mailing  list
> SAM@irtf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sam
>  
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SAM mailing list
> SAM@irtf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sam


_______________________________________________
SAM mailing list
SAM@irtf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sam