Re: [SAM] IETF-71 meeting for SAM RG

"Thomas C. Schmidt" <schmidt@informatik.haw-hamburg.de> Thu, 03 January 2008 21:13 UTC

Return-path: <sam-bounces@irtf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JAXNJ-0000EI-15; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:13:13 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JAXNI-0000CC-3y for sam@irtf.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:13:12 -0500
Received: from mail7.is.haw-hamburg.de ([141.22.192.107]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JAXNF-0008T8-Nb for sam@irtf.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:13:12 -0500
Received: from mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de (osiris.informatik.haw-hamburg.de [141.22.10.154]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail7.is.haw-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58932FE1C; Thu, 3 Jan 2008 22:13:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 30768-01-8; Thu, 3 Jan 2008 22:12:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] (e178184080.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.178.184.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgate.informatik.haw-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5097B400118; Thu, 3 Jan 2008 22:12:55 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <477D4FD6.1040000@informatik.haw-hamburg.de>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 22:12:54 +0100
From: "Thomas C. Schmidt" <schmidt@informatik.haw-hamburg.de>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: buford@samrg.org
Subject: Re: [SAM] IETF-71 meeting for SAM RG
References: <4ce32a820801021053i6426662aq61eba96be14c36ab@mail.gmail.com> <20080103163207.B1D3.MURAMOTO.EIICHI@jp.panasonic.com> <200801032142407644581@126.com> <477D04C3.4020405@cs.uni-goettingen.de> <4ce32a820801030913s57900a01web369de69eefa0bf@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4ce32a820801030913s57900a01web369de69eefa0bf@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at informatik.haw-hamburg.de
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV at HAW Hamburg
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 4b800b1eab964a31702fa68f1ff0e955
Cc: sam <sam@irtf.org>
X-BeenThere: sam@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "For use by members of the Scalable Adaptive Multicast \(SAM\) RG" <sam.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sam>, <mailto:sam-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/sam>
List-Post: <mailto:sam@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sam-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sam>, <mailto:sam-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: sam-bounces@irtf.org

Hi Xiamoming, John, and all,

John Buford wrote:

> 
>     --> My interpretation would be that SAMRG intends to take group
>     management into account and consider multicast over specific scenarios.
>     For the former, I didn't recall much ML discussion on the design space;
>     For the later if I remember it correctly there is an ID (actually a
>     group of IDs) on mobile multicast recently and even discussed in last
>     IETF, would people here be interested on this and like to explore more
>     details?
> 
>  
> There have been no proposals in the RG that I can remember on ALM in 
> mobile P2P,
> I don't think there has been much work on this in general.
>  
There is a good analysis and architectural proposal by Garyfalos &
Almeroth: "A Flexible Overlay Architecture for Mobile IPv6 Multicast",
IEEE Journ. on Selected Areas in Comm., 23 (11), pp. 2194-2205, November
2005.

Also, the Hybrid Shared Tree presentation Matthias gave in Chicago
headed in this direction:
   Wählisch, M., Schmidt, T.C. "Between Underlay and Overlay: On
Deployable, Efficient, Mobility-agnostic Group Communication
Services", Internet Research, 17 (5), pp. 519-534, Emerald
Insight, UK, November 2007.

>     * Operational experience of IPTV services (or IPTV operational
>     practices) - Informational
>     * Experience with the xxx Protocol - Informational (or BCP?)
>     * (Suggestions for) Multicast in mobile IP(v6) environments (or some
>     other scenarios) - Informational
>     etc.
>
Work in this area is currently addressed in MobOpts. There is a
converging problem statement:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-mobopts-mmcastv6-ps

and quite a couple of solutions, which are referenced therein.

A discussion on IPTV issues has recently been issued:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-deng-multimob-ps-mobilemulticast

Btw.: IPTV is currently deployed on significant scale in Europe, using
native IP Multicast and following the business model of carriers taking
the role of content providers/distributors.

Best regards,

thomas


-- 

° Prof. Dr. Thomas C. Schmidt
° HAW Hamburg, Dept. Informatik
° University of Applied Sciences
° Berliner Tor 7, D 20099 Hamburg
° Germany, Fon: +49-40-42875-8157
° http://www.informatik.haw-hamburg.de/~schmidt

_______________________________________________
SAM mailing list
SAM@irtf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sam