[Sandbox-mailoutput] [Django development] Manual Post Requested for draft-testeckert-pim-rfc1112bis
IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org> Wed, 14 July 2021 20:09 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: sandbox-mailoutput@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sandbox-mailoutput@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC213A17A7 for <sandbox-mailoutput@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 13:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EkfqH_AOHsUX for <sandbox-mailoutput@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 13:09:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandbox.amsl.com (sandbox.amsl.com [4.31.198.43]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2FC3A17A3 for <sandbox-mailoutput@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 13:09:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandbox.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandbox.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82CD51012D66A for <sandbox-mailoutput@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Jul 2021 13:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6033736294681512194=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
To: sandbox-mailoutput@ietf.org
Message-ID: <162629336650.56372.1208022640088668467@sandbox.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 13:09:26 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sandbox-mailoutput/EjaI7QFY_hjkp4j-1Ahwu_TDNJA>
Subject: [Sandbox-mailoutput] [Django development] Manual Post Requested for draft-testeckert-pim-rfc1112bis
X-BeenThere: sandbox-mailoutput@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <sandbox-mailoutput.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sandbox-mailoutput>, <mailto:sandbox-mailoutput-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sandbox-mailoutput/>
List-Post: <mailto:sandbox-mailoutput@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sandbox-mailoutput-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sandbox-mailoutput>, <mailto:sandbox-mailoutput-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 20:09:32 -0000
The attached message would have been sent, but the tracker is in development mode. It was not sent to anybody.
--- Begin Message ---Hi, Manual posting has been requested for the following Internet-Draft. The problems found during automated submission were: - Author email error (see below) If the authors claim that this is incorrect, then please look at the actual draft and verify that it does not have the problems indicated. Full idnits results are available at the end of this message. I-D Submission Tool URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/status/120554/ File name : draft-testeckert-pim-rfc1112bis Revision : 00 Submission date : 2021-07-14 Group : Individual Submission Title : Host Extensions IP Multicasting - Any Source Multicast (ASM) Document date : 2021-07-12 Pages : 11 File size : 30.8 KB Submitter : Cindy Morgan <cmorgan@amsl.com> Abstract : This memo specifies the extensions required of a host implementation of the Internet Protocol (IP) to support Any Source Multicast (ASM) IP Multicasting or abbreviated IP Multicast. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Authors: Stephen E. Deering <test@example.com> Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Comment to the secretariat: Idnits result: idnits 2.16.02 /a/www/www6s/staging/draft-testeckert-pim-rfc1112bis-00.txt: Checking boilerplate required by RFC 5378 and the IETF Trust (see https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info): ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- No issues found here. Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/1id-guidelines.txt: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- == The page length should not exceed 58 lines per page, but there was 1 longer page, the longest (page 1) being 614 lines Checking nits according to https://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist : ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ** The document seems to lack a Security Considerations section. ** The document seems to lack an IANA Considerations section. (See Section 2.2 of https://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist for how to handle the case when there are no actions for IANA.) ** There are 45 instances of too long lines in the document, the longest one being 402 characters in excess of 72. == There are 2 instances of lines with multicast IPv4 addresses in the document. If these are generic example addresses, they should be changed to use the 233.252.0.x range defined in RFC 5771 == The 'Obsoletes: ' line in the draft header should list only the _numbers_ of the RFCs which will be obsoleted by this document (if approved); it should not include the word 'RFC' in the list. Miscellaneous warnings: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- == Couldn't figure out when the document was first submitted -- there may comments or warnings related to the use of a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work that could not be issued because of this. Please check the Legal Provisions document at https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info to determine if you need the pre-RFC5378 disclaimer. Checking references for intended status: Proposed Standard ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- (See RFCs 3967 and 4897 for information about using normative references to lower-maturity documents in RFCs) -- Missing reference section? 'RFC4607' on line 173 looks like a reference -- Missing reference section? 'RFC1112' on line 62 looks like a reference -- Missing reference section? 'RFC4861' on line 141 looks like a reference -- Missing reference section? 'RFC3376' on line 148 looks like a reference -- Missing reference section? 'RFC3810' on line 148 looks like a reference -- Missing reference section? 'RFC5790' on line 149 looks like a reference -- Missing reference section? 'RFC4291' on line 170 looks like a reference -- Missing reference section? 'RFC7346' on line 171 looks like a reference -- Missing reference section? 'RFC7371' on line 171 looks like a reference -- Missing reference section? 'RFC3493' on line 378 looks like a reference -- Missing reference section? 'RFC2464' on line 318 looks like a reference -- Missing reference section? 'RFC6085' on line 318 looks like a reference -- Missing reference section? 'RFC3678' on line 379 looks like a reference Summary: 3 errors (**), 0 flaws (~~), 4 warnings (==), 13 comments (--). Run idnits with the --verbose option for more detailed information about the items above.--- End Message ---
- [Sandbox-mailoutput] [Django development] Manual … IETF Secretariat