[Sandbox-mailoutput] [Django development] Internal WG Review: RADIUS EXTensions (radext)

IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org> Fri, 03 February 2023 20:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: sandbox-mailoutput@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sandbox-mailoutput@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C45ADC151524 for <sandbox-mailoutput@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 12:57:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id onTU6ByCQLSi for <sandbox-mailoutput@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 12:57:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandbox.amsl.com (sandbox.amsl.com [50.223.129.198]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C13C14EB1E for <sandbox-mailoutput@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 12:57:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandbox.amsl.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:559:c4c7::105]) by sandbox.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F76E100491C4 for <sandbox-mailoutput@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2023 12:57:17 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5932259379451052012=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
To: sandbox-mailoutput@ietf.org
Message-ID: <167545783743.58628.6133357462849630375@sandbox.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 12:57:17 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sandbox-mailoutput/VbjkrkInDGf5rZCZ5klaFgvdsk8>
Subject: [Sandbox-mailoutput] [Django development] Internal WG Review: RADIUS EXTensions (radext)
X-BeenThere: sandbox-mailoutput@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: <sandbox-mailoutput.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sandbox-mailoutput>, <mailto:sandbox-mailoutput-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sandbox-mailoutput/>
List-Post: <mailto:sandbox-mailoutput@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sandbox-mailoutput-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sandbox-mailoutput>, <mailto:sandbox-mailoutput-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2023 20:57:19 -0000

The attached message would have been sent, but the tracker is in development mode.
It was not sent to anybody.

--- Begin Message ---

A new IETF WG is being considered in the IETF. The draft charter for this WG
is provided below for your review and comment.

Review time is one week.

The IETF Secretariat

RADIUS EXTensions (radext)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Current status: Proposed WG

Chairs:
  Margaret Cullen <mrcullen42@gmail.com>
  Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net>

Assigned Area Director:
  Paul Wouters <paul.wouters@aiven.io>

Operations and Management Area Directors:
  Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
  Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>

Mailing list:
  Address: radext@ietf.org
  To subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/radext
  Archive: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/radext/

Charter: https://sandbox.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-radext/

The RADIUS Extensions (RADEXT) Working Group is chartered to carry
out specific maintenance tasks for the RADIUS protocol as described
below.

To ensure backward compatibility with existing RADIUS implementations,
all documents produced must specify means of interoperation with legacy
RADIUS and, if possible, be backward compatible with existing RADIUS
RFCs, including RFCs 2865-2869, 3162, 3575, 3579, 3580, 4668-4673, 4675,
5080, 5090, 5176, 5997, 6158, 6613, 6614, 6929, 7360, 7585, 8044, and 8559.

The WG may revisit the status of existing RADIUS RFCs, possibly changing
document track categories with minor changes in the documents as needed.

Work Items

The immediate goals of the RADEXT working group are to address the
following issues:

- Deprecate the use of insecure transports outside of secure
networks. This work updates RFC 6421 where possible.

- Bring RFC 6614 (RADIUS/TLS), and RFC 7360 (RADIUS/DTLS) to
Standards track.

- Define best practices for RADIUS roaming, and roaming consortia
based on experience with RADIUS/TLS.

- Improve operations for multi-hop RADIUS networks: e.g. loop detection
and prevention, a multi-hop Status-Server equivalent with ability to
Trace the proxy steps a RADIUS message will follow.

- Extend the 8-bit RADIUS ID space to allow more than 256 "in flight"
packets across one connection.

- Allow for CoA / Disconnect packets to be sent in "reverse" down a
RADIUS/TLS or RADIUS/DTLS connection. This functionality assists with
transit of NATs.

- Defining a secure variant of RADIUS which can be used in a FIPS-140
compliant environment.

There is an external timeline that affects this work: completion by 2024
would enable WG outputs to be included in the planned WiFi 8 release. The
WG will aim to meet that deadline.

Adopting work items not described above will require a re-charter.

Milestones:


--- End Message ---