IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [savi] [SAVI]possible future works

"Jun Bi" <junbi@cernet.edu.cn> Sun, 25 September 2011 07:42 UTC

Return-Path: <junbi@cernet.edu.cn>
X-Original-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C1D321F89BA for <savi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 00:42:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -96.136
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-96.136 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, FH_HAS_XAIMC=2.696, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=1.908, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hLmxVRI3XIMz for <savi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 00:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cernet.edu.cn (cernet.edu.cn [202.112.39.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0120621F88B7 for <savi@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 00:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from junbiVAIOz138([1.203.95.37]) by cernet.edu.cn(AIMC 3.2.0.0) with SMTP id jm54e7f4ffb; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 15:45:08 +0800
Message-ID: <533866227DC249FAB3BAAD4E4CA75A59@junbiVAIOz138>
From: Jun Bi <junbi@cernet.edu.cn>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>, Bingyang LIU <bjornliu@gmail.com>
References: <CAPLDopJT5gdh+SQRTjga0K=k=rmVD5_AEtgTVqi0qk_Uf+kTaA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1109250916080.13829@uplift.swm.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1109250916080.13829@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 15:45:08 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="utf-8"; reply-type="response"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3508.1109
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3508.1109
X-AIMC-AUTH: junbi
X-AIMC-MAILFROM: junbi@cernet.edu.cn
X-AIMC-Msg-ID: qMeYjH1B
Cc: savi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [savi] [SAVI]possible future works
X-BeenThere: savi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the SAVI working group at IETF <savi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/savi>, <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/savi>
List-Post: <mailto:savi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savi>, <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 07:42:34 -0000

>Using it for antispoofing stopped working a long time ago, as you pointed 
>out.

Yes, so maybe SAVI WG could extend the charter to cover that filed.

thanks,
Jun Bi

-----原始邮件----- 
From: Mikael Abrahamsson
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2011 3:17 PM
To: Bingyang LIU
Cc: savi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [savi] [SAVI]possible future works

On Sat, 24 Sep 2011, Bingyang LIU wrote:

> We obviously need better technique to source spoofing than uRPF loose 
> mode.

In my opinion, for IPv4 uRPF loose is only used for ddos protection in
conjunction with null-routing the prefix of the source you want to block.

Using it for antispoofing stopped working a long time ago, as you pointed
out.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se
_______________________________________________
savi mailing list
savi@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email