Re: [savi] Asking for drafts review

"Jun Bi" <junbi@tsinghua.edu.cn> Sat, 18 November 2017 01:39 UTC

Return-Path: <junbi@tsinghua.edu.cn>
X-Original-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF4D126CB6 for <savi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:39:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Ps79iiBq-FP for <savi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:39:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tsinghua.edu.cn (smtp31.tsinghua.edu.cn [101.6.4.55]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24EB2124207 for <savi@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:39:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from junbi-X1-2 (unknown [101.5.130.102]) by app-4 (Coremail) with SMTP id EgQGZQC3+Kw+jw9aIrpOAA--.22207S2; Sat, 18 Nov 2017 09:39:11 +0800 (CST)
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 09:39:09 +0800
From: Jun Bi <junbi@tsinghua.edu.cn>
To: Barry Raveendran Greene <bgreene@senki.org>
Cc: savi <savi@ietf.org>
References: <201711161116516092084@tsinghua.edu.cn>, <9744744F-F868-4109-844A-D158E3F69CC3@senki.org>, <2017111621301428449017@tsinghua.edu.cn>, <E7EFEC91-1F95-4759-82A2-F14CF1FB76CF@senki.org>, <2017111700534005392153@cernet.edu.cn>, <45901E11-7225-4AE0-A8AB-946F09D5B6F8@senki.org>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7, 2, 8, 379[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <201711180939093560351@tsinghua.edu.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart481772783233_=----"
X-CM-TRANSID: EgQGZQC3+Kw+jw9aIrpOAA--.22207S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUU529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7v73 VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UjIYCTnIWjp_UUUYf7k0a2IF6F1UM7kC6x804xWl14x267AK xVWUJVW8JwAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWrJVCq3wAFIxvE14AKwVWUJVWUGw A2ocxC64kIII0Yj41l84x0c7CEw4AK67xGY2AK021l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvE14v26F1j 6w1UM28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26F4j6r4UJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26r xl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x0267AKxVW0oVCq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv 0487Mc02F40E42I26xC2a48xMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r106r15McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxV WUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41lFcxC0VAYjxAxZF0E w4CEw7xC0wCY02Avz4vE14v_KwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJV W8JwC20s026c02F40E14v26r106r1rMI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF 1VAFwI0_Jrv_JF1lIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6x IIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6Fyj6rWUJwCI42IY 6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r1j6r4UMVCEFcxC0VAYjx AxZFUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7sRyHqTDUUUUU==
X-CM-SenderInfo: xmxquxo6wvx0pjkxthxhgxhubq/
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/savi/jVFNWSyk9ncgqers0w-RfUqfqD0>
Subject: Re: [savi] Asking for drafts review
X-BeenThere: savi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the SAVI working group at IETF <savi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/savi>, <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/savi/>
List-Post: <mailto:savi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savi>, <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 01:39:15 -0000

There is no barrier.

As far as I know, Cisco and Juniper implemented SAVI functions.




Best Regards,

Jun Bi
 
From: Barry Raveendran Greene
Date: 2017-11-17 21:16
To: Jun Bi
CC: savi
Subject: Re: [savi] Asking for drafts review


What is the barrier for other switch vendors to deploy this functionality? Why is this not a feature in Cisco, Juniper, Arista, and other products?