[savnet] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-savnet-inter-domain-problem-statement

[Jeffrey Haas <[e-mail]>]

Sriram,

Thanks for addressing my comments.

I'd urge others to review the text regarding private AS numbers for clarity.  In particular, procedures involving SAV when private AS numbers are involved differ depending on whether you're also doing SAV for the Internet as well as private-AS BGP.

-- Jeff


> On Jul 1, 2026, at 09:41, Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) <kotikalapudi.sriram=[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Jeff,
> 
> We (authors) have once again discussed your additional comments and have uploaded a v-19 draft:
> 
> url: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-savnet-inter-domain-problem-statement-19 
> 
> diff: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-savnet-inter-domain-problem-statement-19 
> 
> There were three places where you suggested text changes or additions. These have been incorporated as follows:
> 
> 1. Refined a sentence in the 1st paragraph of the Sec. 1.
> 
> 2. Refined the last paragraph in Sec. 1 where private ASes are talked about.
> 
> 3. Added the new Sec. 6 "Requirement of Troubleshooting".
> 
> We also took care of referencing RFC 6996 when private AS is first mentioned.
> 
> We read and understand your other comments regarding ACLs, SAV table computation scaling, and hidden prefixes. These are valuable considerations to keep in mind during future SAV design deliberations; however, no modifications to the current document are required at this stage. 
> 
> Please let us know if we have misunderstood or missed anything.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Sriram (and co-authors)    
> 
> 
> -- 
> savnet mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]