[sbm] comments on draft-cheshire-sbm-01
Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 12 March 2025 06:00 UTC
Return-Path: <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sbm@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: sbm@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1DBA4188D; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 23:00:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mmCZIX6G48qt; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 23:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x732.google.com (mail-qk1-x732.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::732]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0052A41880; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 23:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x732.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7c5675dec99so112291185a.0; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 23:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1741759234; x=1742364034; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=oRQqIVtqaG5/sokOkARBqkerc2DS2ltdK48rbaemh/E=; b=KTBpCURnmUKJbQZAnEojkMUg9QjvRJbkjagezWrCOTCHdNpI05f43pJbYBk3gP38G9 XWRDKGBhACjtCibpKIzVnkeTyesBhPvwbw/bVHDp/TLkD1iPSEU6t50MsmKLSSONlbWv Rw0NgJc3HuEK5UL6IHSr+sDuyuq6/7VjFg58O26yDbdvrXzlus4AYXaEHxyOl8bwMhPO TGVp9ptW7sMLLwlJnHaqwUoXqlK3HKyM6qeO08DSORYDfVJlbH4lxlHV9Xpcz/hh0Icx nWKUVg0Mhk+F96DxcKclbCcrNnpqf4WhJmNJYoc2wR0KywVSCRBrPBIcV66SV6ShiX+X 73uw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1741759234; x=1742364034; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=oRQqIVtqaG5/sokOkARBqkerc2DS2ltdK48rbaemh/E=; b=UlD/nATVDMIshecNDvDo5/77k2D6iQpWWQXSg/K3sh+dlX6+ysMHtzTwt1Q3vyfYjS MP9WEOJY0RDlk3Iu5wSNdrrvx1lTWpaZybkRI6DC1McS2CaoGa9dbIBuCbSYHnoU4pHF B6PVZBcloYu4LhdRfmRiu4czpkzKnACpcc881Uuxi1am8/XQ8xz0d0V1UjuEcJBAx/TT sPzVTKZcUuHAsf5Iv6596DJcC7Kn3hflMjUhmdvxrYtnHusVzQsSRoTsF/VgNOXN6VAA r7arXbbaxwqFgit7H0p2qEKEe8Wr/cE1BRB+reZdfRKuH5v08jxKNVnkpldg0tMBGJ60 MJ3Q==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWs8twC6M94DjZyI8vZAzCUeu1BSVsFR1uiovZM1J8Hm8ymtPkS0HYQzm+fdGuhj4njF6Ma3Q==@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwKxc/KIvL8CQaOFx0w3LZ1RLk5D7hXwszSV5Qh0y3M9EvD+FyX LCJKKHc5BQ2o+MT9lsgLYm9TGl22l8iImtSqRbp8r7Cdpz0J7pYRW6qiKEPf5WRD0h6YF22VcNA kHax62x/2579ntb8kOuRzSUHRbWv2BbC9
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsZrMYeYO+yplXmL4Sqc3DaCX/pJb2R3xPLEcRWqgFbeXgsBl2qpyJH1rNfAJg NhKqJeKmIpAipk/ikafvwUfxotiCHGZuqee53pgwNPr2916rktnhZdYejpYmmC0QLYfqkiirVdk hpAu3x/8HsZ8+g357dapPDV0cy7rw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG4TyUMN3cS5jy0J8K/G9ia+2bsq3QWPNwnhckdbP0MMB9uQc04gdBDind4K8GenUXTyVOZyVs56ufqjHpwAB8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:240b:b0:7c5:5909:18e5 with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7c559091c2emr1163551285a.3.1741759233982; Tue, 11 Mar 2025 23:00:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 23:00:23 -0700
X-Gm-Features: AQ5f1JomopBoMYQ7vur3P2Bvj0bA9riI-LAdQJH1arzTZEMteQXIFxbkkOCugf0
Message-ID: <CAAK044ReS39FtMH+3AnJWOM7Ej9a+CcwO4hwOKmUJduYPyjZCQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: sbm@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006d03e606301eec93"
Message-ID-Hash: VJAIZIISGZI2XDPDTHH7RP2DAX4MYAVC
X-Message-ID-Hash: VJAIZIISGZI2XDPDTHH7RP2DAX4MYAVC
X-MailFrom: nsd.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>, tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [sbm] comments on draft-cheshire-sbm-01
List-Id: Source Buffer Management <sbm.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sbm/m2294WTJakMcFH0ImyVrXUYGtiU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sbm>
List-Help: <mailto:sbm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:sbm-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:sbm@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:sbm-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:sbm-leave@ietf.org>
Hello, I've read draft-cheshire-sbm-01 and I think it's a useful and important idea. I have several comments on this draft out of my curiosity. I CC-ed this as we will have sessions for the draft at tsvwg and tcpm in the next IETF meeting. 1: I am curious about what would be the best practice to write effective applications with this option. Can future versions of the draft provide some guidance or examples? (I personally prefer sample pseudo code if possible) 2: Since the draft mentions it can be applicable for bulk transfer applications, I'm wondering if the usage of this feature would be different between real time applications and bulk transfer applications 3; Does this draft intend to specify how to calculate the replenish time or is it out of scope? I think it would be better to have a unified way anyway Thanks, -- Yoshi
- [sbm] comments on draft-cheshire-sbm-01 Yoshifumi Nishida