[Schc] Quick comment on draft-barthel-schc-oam-schc-01
Robert Moskowitz <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com> Thu, 27 July 2023 16:55 UTC
Return-Path: <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: schc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: schc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7205CC151710 for <schc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 09:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cXaKfMLajK51 for <schc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 09:55:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [23.123.122.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15AB1C1516E2 for <schc@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 09:55:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72BCE625FC for <schc@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 12:54:33 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at htt-consult.com
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id mrSKwV0ZWeVF for <schc@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 12:54:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [31.133.130.12] (dhcp-820c.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.130.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5EADF62573 for <schc@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 12:54:29 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <9a4b734b-e9ca-b069-bb83-c5c6420c6e37@htt-consult.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 12:55:03 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0
To: "schc@ietf.org" <schc@ietf.org>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm-ietf@htt-consult.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/schc/WFznZTAR9HM2zN9CMBA5I2fygVg>
Subject: [Schc] Quick comment on draft-barthel-schc-oam-schc-01
X-BeenThere: schc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Static Context Header Compression <schc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/schc>, <mailto:schc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/schc/>
List-Post: <mailto:schc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:schc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/schc>, <mailto:schc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 16:55:16 -0000
The Abstract is too long and the Introduction too short. It is as if they got switch. Abstract should just say something about the interaction of SCHC and OAM. 1 - 2 paragraphs. Move all the rest of the content to the Introduction. I once had a draft with a long Abstract and it did not go well in IESG comments...
- [Schc] Quick comment on draft-barthel-schc-oam-sc… Robert Moskowitz