[scim] can a User address be primary

[David Moebius <[e-mail]>]

Hello,

in the document http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-scim-core-schema-02
at point

*http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-scim-core-schema-02#section-12.2
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-scim-core-schema-02#section-12.2>*

*you can find an example that a address can be primary*

addresses": [
       {
         "type": "work",
         "streetAddress": "100 Universal City Plaza",
         "locality": "Hollywood",
         "region": "CA",
         "postalCode": "91608",
         "country": "USA",
         "formatted": "100 Universal City Plaza\nHollywood, CA 91608 USA",
         "primary": true
       },


at the point http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-scim-core-schema-02#section-12.7

"name":"addresses",
          "type":"complex",
          "multiValued":true,
          "description":"A physical mailing address for this User, as
described in (address Element). Canonical Type Values of work, home,
and other. The value attribute is a complex type with the following
sub-attributes.",


Mortimore, et al.        Expires March 03, 2014                [Page 31]

  <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-scim-core-schema-02#page-32>Internet-Draft
         draft-scim-core-schema-02
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-scim-core-schema-02>
August 2013


          "readOnly":false,
          "required":false,
          "caseExact":false,
          "subAttributes":[
            {
              "name":"formatted"

...

it looks like that address should not have the field primary.

Since it makes sence for me I would think that it is ok if a address
is primary.


Can you conform this?


by David