Re: [scim] SCIM is now officially re-opened

Paul Lanzi <paul@remediant.com> Thu, 28 October 2021 16:35 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@remediant.com>
X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB7C3A0F0A for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=remediant.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9XNGZ_XEF9E5 for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com (mail-ed1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E64B3A0F04 for <scim@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id m17so26065446edc.12 for <scim@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:35:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=remediant.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=G5q1No3kPz+9/P1ErY49xIZ9E/j1WLtBqz1CqXK1814=; b=ksalM67lsEg0c9kXoZ+wbKjDJPbIWCe5aF/pQMemayqSbhCe7Qu2XeHSGa58B2TYV0 lrBAcQXLleI//tKlh1Sv90+7qHU3bmqPSDiTVj+U20pYy0G4EUoHPueJstVhZSkirSbV xoWQrHz8FyRs7Lpn9cQT1+eiKHu6Wm5OtPi00=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=G5q1No3kPz+9/P1ErY49xIZ9E/j1WLtBqz1CqXK1814=; b=u20Esa7qbk8rRUs8j2iOHQAFBviFT4HzAY7Q0ijpSgjI2eV8rxN6WV+cY8vgoQ4lta WfHFM710zFUPQLOnz+Kc0PfcJwDMSEhkv5DG+4yMPTShN2i0NIFUM5hiMpesy+zxLyom zWWlFh6I5c1cAiT1LL2d1CcGqkYMqwYlQJnAws6OOcTsuxny3+wkTUpLsrHP9e5fFlId 31aKeUCDImGNxuy84fNfx6chnk79T+uUPpZjhehx2rUSIVwPYox7NHksL03TspHETtAE n9LlVAdlMJ9Af3+GYIVfg849O6Um+9sS9YGTRw2b83GMWF2QIwHBJvDDlR6loHnEf/HR TcTA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ju9jhmFKBXRZrXQ2IQFFGha0ho5qUtvH4aiQIYcE6WppKb1a3 FD+Gijd5GiLKTowJ88o3kK+bDnNe70LiDpw7dPeaaPbixoLTLw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxQpEXocHd3kMK4NFRCjo4gmBKHfjUjXmToN9GjnAcEw/rK+T8LKJgFD8jJGYh8OWFkQ8JCmBXhsaLVgD8jy3g=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7212:: with SMTP id dr18mr6800068ejc.298.1635438942967; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <A7C4ED4F-FE15-4F0F-8943-6410B43CC5D5@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <A7C4ED4F-FE15-4F0F-8943-6410B43CC5D5@cisco.com>
From: Paul Lanzi <paul@remediant.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:35:31 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+7VvRamAbMYcZ-5QQq3Gz6JKEWxCr10k1C=7NkY=z4Wt6aLyQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "scim@ietf.org" <scim@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="000000000000402d3505cf6c4d3f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/scim/KSoXfMTCYgHdrHJvYWSMYLPK6G0>
Subject: Re: [scim] SCIM is now officially re-opened
X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF <scim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/scim/>
List-Post: <mailto:scim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 16:35:53 -0000

Hi Nancy - clarification request re: the time of the meeting. The
Datatracker website seems to have 0400 to 0600 (early morning) Pacific time
on Nov 11 for our session:
[image: image.png]

https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/agenda/

My hunch is that this is an implication from the meeting originally being
planned to happen onsite in a European time zone.

Can you confirm our session will be Noon to 2pm Pacific and not 4am to 6am
Pacific on November 11?

Thanks,

--Paul
ᐧ

On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 3:38 PM Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing) <ncamwing=
40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Thank you Roman for helping get this expedited as well!
>
> SCIM Participants,
> This means we will be meeting at IETF 112 as the SCIM WG instead of a
> BoF.  With that in mind, we will be meeting on Thursday Nov. 11
> 12:00-14:00PST
> and am now soliciting agenda items.
>
> If you would like to present a proposed draft or charter topic, please
> send me your request and the amount of time you will need; please send your
> requests
>  By end of next week as first draft is due Oct. 27th and final by Nov. 1st.
>
> Thanks, Nancy
>
>
> On 10/21/21, 8:08 AM, "scim on behalf of Roman Danyliw" <
> scim-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of rdd@cert.org> wrote:
>
>     Hi!
>
>     During today's telechat, the IESG officially approved the new charter
> for SCIM [1].  Hence, when IETF 112 convenes, SCIM will be an active WG.
> The various official announcements and changes in the datatracker should
> occur soon.
>
>     Thank you to the IETF 111 SINS BOF chairs (Barry Leiba, Morteza
> Ansari, Nancy Cam-Winget) and the proponents (Pamela Dingle, Paul Lanzi,
> Matt Peterson) for your leadership in getting us to this point.
>
>     Regards,
>     Roman
>
>     [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-scim/
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     scim mailing list
>     scim@ietf.org
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> scim mailing list
> scim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim
>