[scim] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-scim-01-00: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 01 October 2021 09:47 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: scim@ietf.org
Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419FD3A0113; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 02:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: scim-chairs@ietf.org, scim@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.38.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <163308164955.21749.16187121078868609488@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2021 02:47:30 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/scim/ezkTqSuHZR2IzAg5YNmyPbmFWms>
Subject: [scim] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-scim-01-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF <scim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/scim/>
List-Post: <mailto:scim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2021 09:47:31 -0000

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-scim-01-00: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-scim/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Looks good to me except some nits:

1) please use different symbols for first-level and second-level bullets (+ fix some indentation)

2) I was unaware that the IETF has published more than 70.000 RFCs as in "schema (RFC76744)" ;)

Regards

-éric