[SCITT] Digital-asset cryptographic continuity as a possible SCITT statement profile

[Brandon Davis <[e-mail]>]

Hello SCITT WG,

I’m contributing a read-only research/interoperability project called
WS-CAE that models cryptographic authority, migration state, critical
dependencies, evidence, and recovery boundaries for digital-asset systems.

We have now implemented a content-addressed continuity manifest plus
append-order Merkle inclusion proofs, linked checkpoints, frozen
interoperability vectors, and SCITT-oriented statement serializers. The
implementation also exercises current SCITT tooling and official
cross-implementation vectors in CI.

I’m not proposing a new signature algorithm, blockchain, token, or
transparency service. I’m asking a narrower architecture question: would a
digital-asset cryptographic-continuity statement be an appropriate SCITT
profile/use case, and if so, what existing SCITT structures should carry
the manifest content ID, dependency/evidence claims, and checkpoint linkage?

Public implementation/review surface:
https://github.com/Bdavis1390/Sara_pro/pull/221

The branch is research-stage; no SCITT/IETF endorsement or adoption is
claimed. Corrections, prior art, or guidance toward the right WG process
are welcome.

Regards,
Brandon Davis
Worldshepherd