Re: [SCITT] Can someone please resurrect the use case document
Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@ietf.contact> Thu, 18 April 2024 14:29 UTC
Return-Path: <henk.birkholz@ietf.contact>
X-Original-To: scitt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scitt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48619C14F685 for <scitt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 07:29:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.238
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.238 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.441, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ietf.contact
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KAbWz2G3xCFp for <scitt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 07:29:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp02-ext3.udag.de (smtp02-ext3.udag.de [62.146.106.33]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8D76C14F68F for <scitt@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 07:29:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPV6:2a01:599:705:655e:8cc4:48e3:6e82:148e] (tmo-125-142.customers.d1-online.com [80.187.125.142]) by smtp02-ext3.udag.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 48D8AE0F37; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 16:29:40 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ietf.contact; s=uddkim-202310; t=1713450581; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+mWp21qau+sxhBxS8loOdXbAhKvo/RAel0ezYQDzAqE=; b=PWC2wWaqPoFn4Z5HDFwRuTcgsl18hj2e0VFji2JzFKPkxA0Mu7gwrLwmWSjtKnnjuGn9A8 V8lCxQDP+JeFCByDDxy2WrCEq71FGRav7kyk6Kf751YtSlBF3V5ea91EA3NnSiAcCPUa7m kisaK/arEHTS1hj1Hs3Ja9k5hXHX4bEm8l0YT5NlJAB1UmWLZFCChuVpgozGdwVfAWFP4+ j6O8pd6s+H8zx8v52AVcC0x4zpnr6fyFTxMZ19/XRsC2X7XY3A762q29Tr5gg+rPiU8uEZ U2Zwn0HdrN/RRBNtDpmkwFiOpZrjuyegAOh4RCifjD7VPAhNBe7FwWsCiHESFw==
Message-ID: <6d2ba77f-9c6f-9b04-fd1f-e3e200dbbc4a@ietf.contact>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 16:29:39 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: dick@reliableenergyanalytics.com, 'Henk Birkholz' <henk.birkholz@ietf.contact>, 'Jon Geater' <jon.geater@datatrails.ai>, scitt@ietf.org
References: <1607901da9199$ff1b3d50$fd51b7f0$@reliableenergyanalytics.com> <CWXP265MB57669DC8829005E4ECCF94BE980E2@CWXP265MB5766.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <9ff0eb86-d5c4-12ae-5a50-022f9c587ea4@ietf.contact> <1629601da919b$b9d826c0$2d887440$@reliableenergyanalytics.com>
From: Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@ietf.contact>
In-Reply-To: <1629601da919b$b9d826c0$2d887440$@reliableenergyanalytics.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Authentication-Results: smtp02-ext3.udag.de; auth=pass smtp.auth=henk.birkholz@ietf.contact smtp.mailfrom=henk.birkholz@ietf.contact
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/scitt/hOeb3d1Se8IDFvHgs9CKmSlGvns>
Subject: Re: [SCITT] Can someone please resurrect the use case document
X-BeenThere: scitt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Supply Chain Integrity, Transparency, and Trust" <scitt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scitt>, <mailto:scitt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/scitt/>
List-Post: <mailto:scitt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scitt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scitt>, <mailto:scitt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 14:29:47 -0000
So - I might have jumped the gun here a little bit (that's what you get for doing things ad-hoc during travels). I just refreshed the version number once (not thinking about the plan to simply let it expire). I think it does not hurt. It is just a tad bit more visible for another 6 months now. > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-scitt-software-use-cases-03.html On 18.04.24 16:21, Dick Brooks wrote: > Thanks, Henk. My presentation is at noon, hopefully it will be there by then. > > Thanks, > > Dick Brooks > > Active Member of the CISA Critical Manufacturing Sector, > Sector Coordinating Council – A Public-Private Partnership > > Never trust software, always verify and report! ™ > http://www.reliableenergyanalytics.com > Email: dick@reliableenergyanalytics.com > Tel: +1 978-696-1788 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@ietf.contact> > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2024 10:17 AM > To: Jon Geater <jon.geater@datatrails.ai>; dick@reliableenergyanalytics.com; scitt@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [SCITT] Can someone please resurrect the use case document > > Oops. Some race condition here. Sry! > > On 18.04.24 16:15, Jon Geater wrote: >> Here’s the direct link to the document and its history: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-scitt-software-use-cases/ >> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-scitt-software-use-cases/ >>> >> >> At the meeting at -119 it was decided to allow the use cases document >> to expire, since there’s little need to actually turn it into a full >> RFC and the WGLC was not too conclusive. Exactly as you’re doing here >> we can still reference the expired draft as a useful view of history >> and context to the architecture and SCRAPI. >> >> I am given to understand this approach is not unusual for use case >> documents. >> >> Jon >> >> *From: *SCITT <scitt-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Dick Brooks >> <dick@reliableenergyanalytics.com> >> *Date: *Thursday, 18 April 2024 at 16:09 >> *To: *scitt@ietf.org <scitt@ietf.org> >> *Subject: *[SCITT] Can someone please resurrect the use case document >> >> Hello, >> >> I’m preparing for a presentation today and wanted to refer the >> audience to the SCITT Use Cases document, but it no longer appears >> under the SCITT document page. >> >> Can some with permissions please resurrect the SCITT Use Cases >> document so that it appears under the Documents tab: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/scitt/documents/ >> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/scitt/documents/> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Dick Brooks >> >> /Active Member of the CISA Critical Manufacturing Sector, / >> >> /Sector Coordinating Council – A Public-Private Partnership/ >> >> */Never trust software, always verify and report! >> <https://reliableenergyanalytics.com/products>/*™ >> >> http://www.reliableenergyanalytics.com >> <http://www.reliableenergyanalytics.com/> >> >> Email: dick@reliableenergyanalytics.com >> <mailto:dick@reliableenergyanalytics.com> >> >> Tel: +1 978-696-1788 >> >> >
- [SCITT] Can someone please resurrect the use case… Dick Brooks
- Re: [SCITT] Can someone please resurrect the use … Jon Geater
- Re: [SCITT] Can someone please resurrect the use … Henk Birkholz
- Re: [SCITT] Can someone please resurrect the use … Dick Brooks
- Re: [SCITT] Can someone please resurrect the use … Henk Birkholz
- Re: [SCITT] Can someone please resurrect the use … Dick Brooks
- Re: [SCITT] Can someone please resurrect the use … Carsten Bormann
- Re: [SCITT] Can someone please resurrect the use … Dick Brooks