[SCITT] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-scitt-scrapi-07.txt

[Dick Brooks <[e-mail]>]

Looking forward to seeing this move forward. Good progress.

 

Thanks,

 

Dick Brooks

   

Active Member of the CISA Critical Manufacturing Sector, 

Sector Coordinating Council – A Public-Private Partnership

Lifetime IEEE Member

 <https://reliableenergyanalytics.com/products> Never trust software, always
verify and report! ™

Risk always exists, but trust must be earned and awarded.™ 

https://businesscyberguardian.com/ 

Email: [e-mail]

Tel: [phone]

 

 

From: Nicole Bates <nicolebates=[e-mail]> 
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2026 11:29 AM
To: Jon Geater <jon.geater=[e-mail]>; Henk Birkholz
<[e-mail]>; Amaury Chamayou
<[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
Subject: [SCITT] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-scitt-scrapi-07.txt

 

During last week's SCITT meeting, Amaury stepped up to be the Shepherd. 

  _____  

From: Jon Geater <jon.geater=[e-mail]
<mailto:jon.geater=[e-mail]> >
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2026 8:19 AM
To: Henk Birkholz <[e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> >; Amaury Chamayou
<[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >;
[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>  <[e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> >
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [SCITT] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-scitt-scrapi-07.txt 

 

Yes, feels reasonable. Who will Shepherd it? The tool is uncomfortable with
moving states without having a Shepherd identified. 

 

  _____  

From: Henk Birkholz <[e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> >
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2026 5:16:35 PM
To: Jon Geater <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>; Amaury Chamayou <[e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> >; [e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]>  <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
Subject: Re: [SCITT] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-scitt-scrapi-07.txt 

 

Hi chairs,

could we move this to the next phase then, please? It's "Submit to IESG 
for Publication", if my memory serves me well.


Viele Grüße,

Henk

On 11.02.26 17:08, Jon Geater wrote:
> Wonderful, thank you
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Amaury Chamayou <Amaury.Chamayou=[e-mail]>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 11, 2026 5:07:05 PM
> *To:* Jon Geater <jon.geater=[e-mail]
<mailto:jon.geater=[e-mail]> >; Henk 
> Birkholz <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>; [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>  <[e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> >
> *Subject:* [SCITT] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-scitt-scrapi-07.txt
> We are in the weekly meeting at the moment, attended by Bob, Dick and I 
> this week, and there are no concerns here.
> 
> Amaury
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Jon Geater <jon.geater=[e-mail]
<mailto:jon.geater=[e-mail]> >
> *Sent:* 09 February 2026 08:09
> *To:* Henk Birkholz <[e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> >; [e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]>  
> <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> >
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [SCITT] Re: I-D Action: 
> draft-ietf-scitt-scrapi-07.txt
> Having seen no objections to this in the past week and knowing the state 
> of the draft I’m inclined to agree.
> 
> ALL SCITT WATCHERS I propose that we give people until WEDNESDAY to 
> riase concerns, otherwise we'll move to last call. I appreciate that 
> runs into the IETF meeting but given attendance of this group I assume 
> that'll be OK.
> 
> So...last call for last call :)
> 
> Jon
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Henk Birkholz <[e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> >
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 4, 2026 7:42:47 PM
> *To:* [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>  <[e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> >
> *Subject:* [SCITT] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-scitt-scrapi-07.txt
> Hi list,
> hi chairs,
> 
> we thoroughly addressed all WGLC comments and have retained content
> consistency while incorporating the suggested changes.
> 
> As no further discussion spawned and everything seems to be polished
> now, the authors think we can move on along the process with -07.
> 
> @chairs: are you inclined to agree?
> 
> 
> Viele Grüße,
> 
> Henk
> 
> On 04.02.26 17:37, [e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]>  wrote:
>> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-scitt-scrapi-07.txt is now available. It is a
work
>> item of the Supply Chain Integrity, Transparency, and Trust (SCITT) WG of
the
>> IETF.
>> 
>>     Title:   SCITT Reference APIs
>>     Authors: Henk Birkholz
>>              Jon Geater
>>     Name:    draft-ietf-scitt-scrapi-07.txt
>>     Pages:   27
>>     Dates:   2026-02-04
>> 
>> Abstract:
>> 
>>     This document describes a REST API that supports the normative
>>     requirements of the SCITT Architecture.  Optional key discovery and
>>     query interfaces are provided to support interoperability with X.509
>>     Certificates, alternative methods commonly used to support public key
>>     discovery and Artifact Repositories.
>> 
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-scitt-scrapi/ 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-scitt-scrapi/>
>> 
>> There is also an HTML version available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-scitt-scrapi-07.html 
> <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-scitt-scrapi-07.html>
>> 
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-scitt-scrapi-07 
> <https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-scitt-scrapi-07>
>> 
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
>> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> SCITT mailing list -- [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> 
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
<mailto:[e-mail]> 
>