[SCITT] Re: New draft: The Coverage Attestation Profile (draft-hillier-coverage-attestation-00), and a request to break it

[Iman Schrock <[e-mail]>]

Dr. Joel,

Thank you. You asked us to break it and then treated every break as
useful input instead of defending the draft. That makes me more
confident in the work, not less.

The right next step from our side is simple. We will preserve PR #630
as the pinned -00 reading. When you freeze -01, send the exact schema
and vector bundle. We will first run the unchanged -00 implementation
against it so any semantic movement is visible, then update separately
if the new text requires it. If it disagrees, the disagreement is the
result.

I also want to keep one boundary intact in the next round: CAP-1 can
make producer-declared coverage and internal accounting testable.
EMILIA can authenticate the issuer and bind supplied population
commitments and the report to a named reconciliation program. Neither
establishes that the source population was complete or honestly
enumerated.

This is exactly the kind of collaboration I hoped for. Looking forward to -01.

Best,
Dr. Iman