IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sdn] [bmwg] Terminology for Benchmarking SDN Controller Performance

"Bhuvan \(Veryx Technologies\)" <bhuvaneswaran.vengainathan@veryxtech.com> Sun, 18 October 2015 16:15 UTC

Return-Path: <bhuvaneswaran.vengainathan@veryxtech.com>
X-Original-To: sdn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sdn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8941A901D for <sdn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 09:15:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.418
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.418 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, RELAY_IS_203=0.994, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2o3PWa8bUMMg for <sdn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 09:15:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.veryxtech.com (mail.veryxtech.com [203.196.171.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CBE91A900A for <sdn@irtf.org>; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 09:15:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.veryxtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3570329DB; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:43:02 +0530 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at veryxtech.com
Received: from mail.veryxtech.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.veryxtech.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uX5kbcY5W-lu; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:42:56 +0530 (IST)
Received: from LT015 (unknown [45.112.22.98]) by mail.veryxtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E175C30E67; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:42:55 +0530 (IST)
From: "Bhuvan (Veryx Technologies)" <bhuvaneswaran.vengainathan@veryxtech.com>
To: "'MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)'" <acmorton@att.com>, adrian@olddog.co.uk
References: <006d01d109b8$5dbaf120$1930d360$@olddog.co.uk> <4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D0BB67F953D@NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com>
In-Reply-To: <4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D0BB67F953D@NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 21:45:42 +0530
Message-ID: <001a01d109c0$3ce2ea90$b6a8bfb0$@veryxtech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQJ5gtvcp5t4dI953h1MgpbVo1EzHgLD7HAinQpU78A=
Content-Language: en-in
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sdn/3zcuAVOVGZOgEVsP2J6Fz3ZXgfI>
Cc: sdn@irtf.org, bmwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Sdn] [bmwg] Terminology for Benchmarking SDN Controller Performance
X-BeenThere: sdn@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List to Discuss SDN Research Group in the IRTF <sdn.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/sdn>, <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sdn/>
List-Post: <mailto:sdn@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/sdn>, <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 16:15:53 -0000

Hi Al and Adrian,

Sorry that we missed this comment in the last revision. Thanks for bringing
this again.  
We will certainly reference the terms that are already defined and serves
the purpose in next revision.

Thanks,
Bhuvan (Co-Author - Terminology for Benchmarking SDN Controller Performance
draft)

-----Original Message-----
From: bmwg [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Sent: 18 October 2015 20:57
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk; bmwg@ietf.org
Cc: sdn@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Terminology for Benchmarking SDN Controller Performance

Hi Adrian, thanks for your comment.

One of my earlier comments (as co-chair, I believe) was that the terminology
needed to be synchronized with RFC 7426 (which had just been published when
I made the comment).  I see that the authors reproduced the definitions from
RFCs, rather than listing them as terms defined elsewhere.  "path" from RFC
2330 is another example.

So, the first comment is to embrace the existing terminology through
references. Then, more of us will be using the same terms, and reviews of
this work will be more efficient.

regards,
Al
(as co-chair)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: bmwg [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 11:19 AM
> To: bmwg@ietf.org
> Cc: sdn@irtf.org
> Subject: [bmwg] Terminology for Benchmarking SDN Controller 
> Performance
> 
> Hi,
> 
> It surprises me that draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-term 
> makes no reference to RFC 7426 but instead defines its own 
> terminology. Why is that?
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> --
> Read my latest...
> Tales from the Wood - Eighteen new fairy tales 
> http://www.feedaread.com/books/Tales-from-the-Wood-9781786100924.aspx
> http://www.amazon.co.uk/Tales-Wood-Adrian-Farrel/dp/1786100924
> Or buy from me direct.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg

_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
bmwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email