Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints-03

Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Fri, 07 July 2017 11:56 UTC

Return-Path: <w@1wt.eu>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6CA612EAAA; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 04:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R9y5Jy3OsUAw; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 04:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1wt.eu (wtarreau.pck.nerim.net [62.212.114.60]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EDE4129AD2; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 04:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v67Bu1EG027915; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 13:56:01 +0200
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 13:56:01 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>
Cc: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>, secdir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints.all@ietf.org, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20170707115601.GB27560@1wt.eu>
References: <149919703750.15996.5462759432298024921@ietfa.amsl.com> <CANatvzx8GsvoYMscHciKNrOwRzcz1v7=jTCUUp4Z5E=jO9Wd6g@mail.gmail.com> <7273f8ab-c1ff-5dff-862e-0a1ead6d28b2@gmail.com> <20170707092316.GA27560@1wt.eu> <CANatvzygATN6Rd7nGPuGLSpbYs65TV01BFMFrB9Atq1ojcXHJQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CANatvzygATN6Rd7nGPuGLSpbYs65TV01BFMFrB9Atq1ojcXHJQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/-Y8ceOK0MtSpr6nbiWoN4JmbBD0>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-early-hints-03
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 11:56:10 -0000

On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 08:29:36PM +0900, Kazuho Oku wrote:
> I also believe that a whitelist-based approach will be a better choice
> than a blacklist-based one, since 103 is an optimization that is
> beneficial when sent to a client that is known to make use of it. For
> most websites, whitelisting the major browsers that support it (once
> they do) or the CDN they use will be enough to get the most out of the
> status code.

OK. That was just a proposal :-)

Willy