Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions-05

"Ori Finkelman (IETF)" <ori.finkelman.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 27 August 2019 07:38 UTC

Return-Path: <orifinkelman@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC295120018; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sNwuh9w10iIU; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa2e.google.com (mail-vk1-xa2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C74112004A; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa2e.google.com with SMTP id p5so2598219vkm.5; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hhhPnl+OpHv6OxRZVTbdQR8bDj5CNpx/X/FoABqSaqk=; b=gb4CgM9ReOAthj8NtGHFVtxnn1LC0YVF15XUsntyBb0OhdSd7dTSJkM1pmFF8KmnXg JKBoYSnABeIuafaTSFaC9GVCDUpZbZxBIXYfKrHPjoAVvwNsYuwq9ZR/ntiS3whU8LMP 6CdI/VBqktksgBm/9bGCMmxv8rGbbP+lYlMDlufOtfH97EnOLAcaTO5wIcsCDgXXzaXB ovYbxQLDIAhBu6Rj+AUjeL0Uo8nkj7IBAAMXFKtg1ytxNXjgRuCwYSuh21cXbWRBgxSt J2yZPXswoN8K6437oZOE2sph56xcRWIZrw9L8sKi9LSR9srIYPSdjU3IIUdLbGt8/9fY 4JFg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hhhPnl+OpHv6OxRZVTbdQR8bDj5CNpx/X/FoABqSaqk=; b=hFVtQndzt4D067qrgdmeXBOA4yh+7jimAgZe6K73kY427iL8qGWito+RZjRCPGV3rF eupONf6l10fWzbDGQfHzF9waQSmoWpSe0+pFFKd8eK8X53QRiXMGHbGviAl+j9eR/C3j psHt0ZEgXR8lCROYSdXDEYcPaHQheY43sIwcdjeZ6wNzHpsDGZuGvifGV36/eSxChMhJ qKssiddDnrDHdWpJGv53ht+wN2g0eD/uYWxihPvBql4VtyBwMak4OcABO9tUkCdsnn68 yDWW/sJgxaW0zehWQWNuF9c/w/P19ClJQudYcWzzl3S0dYC3E+uiVnE4NeSXkFq1eRhh WG7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWJJFfjlCWho2Lcgaegysfi4Ix5Dar1JI2y5bBlH71ijpIeMRld ye7p9hKl4akETqoFVf8a3uCcVeV7iNw/qtBVFck=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqywH4jiL5Rsob6GP0NhyZvvxhaLXMeEDGV3pldQwEbvXLSeXqOjS/6XfALTCt+0V690m5oxxw0+goC29yd+h9A=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:1c0c:: with SMTP id c12mr10383664vkc.44.1566891495572; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 00:38:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <156683976148.30653.13816124126977906406@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156683976148.30653.13816124126977906406@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: "Ori Finkelman (IETF)" <ori.finkelman.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 10:37:58 +0300
Message-ID: <CAM8emGX_Y1iz=nh9S0fyQo-TkZjsC2-6W2KoizEUG7R9=LUOsQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Linda Dunbar <Linda.dunbar@huawei.com>
Cc: secdir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, "<cdni@ietf.org>" <cdni@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000feca020591145af1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/05MppipUH5MLfvfe5e8fQ8t5O4Y>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-cdni-request-routing-extensions-05
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 07:38:29 -0000

Hi Linda,
Thank you for your time and comments.
I will address them in the next revision.

Best regards,
Ori

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 8:16 PM Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> Review result: Has Nits
>
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
> effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
> comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
> directors.
>  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any
> other
> last call comments.
>
> The terminology RR (Request Router) and CP (Content Provider) specified by
> the
> Terminology are not used for the entire document. I assume that RR would
> be the
> one request content, isn't? is RR same as Client?  Is RR part of
> Downstream CDN
> Provider? is the CP same as Downstream CDN provider or Upstream CDN
> Provider?
>
> who issued the Redirect Target?
>
> It would be good for the document to clearly specify the relationship of
> all
> the entities, such as who makes request and who respond, and who use the
> Redirect Target capability, etc.
>
> Thank you very much.
> Linda Dunbar
>
>
>