Re: [secdir] [DNSOP] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl-04
Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com> Tue, 18 May 2021 10:04 UTC
Return-Path: <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395BB3A15EB for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 May 2021 03:04:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iXPkocZX8pGn for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 May 2021 03:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.open-xchange.com (alcatraz.open-xchange.com [87.191.39.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CE0C3A15E7 for <secdir@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 May 2021 03:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imap.open-xchange.com (imap.open-xchange.com [84.81.54.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx4.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C692C6A0DC; Tue, 18 May 2021 12:04:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from plato ([84.81.54.175]) by imap.open-xchange.com with ESMTPSA id /YjOLyiRo2CxHQAA3c6Kzw (envelope-from <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>); Tue, 18 May 2021 12:04:24 +0200
Message-ID: <02781d07a6a65dd350a49a53566842f36ee486f3.camel@powerdns.com>
From: Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
To: "Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy" <TirumaleswarReddy_Konda@McAfee.com>, "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 12:04:24 +0200
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR16MB41182B3A2DD375C674D47BDFEA5B9@PH0PR16MB4118.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
References: <PH0PR16MB41182B3A2DD375C674D47BDFEA5B9@PH0PR16MB4118.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
Organization: PowerDNS.COM B.V.
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-s25EbwE2q39i3XGy0fY/"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/1kiTiMe1ggxQjXPnODjTJ27sM1o>
Subject: Re: [secdir] [DNSOP] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-nsec-ttl-04
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 10:04:31 -0000
On Mon, 2021-05-03 at 09:46 +0000, Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy wrote: > > > Reviewer: Tirumaleswar Reddy > Review result: Ready > > I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These reviews are primarily for the benefit of the Security ADs. Document editors and WG chairs > should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. > > > > > I think the Security Considerations section is adequate in its coverage to address the attack not handled in a number of RFCs the document will update. > Thank you! Kind regards, -- Peter van Dijk PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/
- [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dn… Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy
- Re: [secdir] [DNSOP] Secdir last call review of d… Peter van Dijk