[secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc5066bis-07
"Scott G. Kelly" <scott@hyperthought.com> Thu, 12 December 2013 12:27 UTC
Return-Path: <scott@hyperthought.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B75D81AE284 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 04:27:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Edx37YJVhGBO for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 04:27:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp66.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (smtp66.iad3a.emailsrvr.com [173.203.187.66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100AB1AC85E for <secdir@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 04:27:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp17.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 234232A00B3; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 07:27:12 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: OK
Received: from app41.wa-webapps.iad3a (relay.iad3a.rsapps.net [172.27.255.110]) by smtp17.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 071722A00A8; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 07:27:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from hyperthought.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by app41.wa-webapps.iad3a (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7FAE28004A; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 07:27:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: by apps.rackspace.com (Authenticated sender: scott@hyperthought.com, from: scott@hyperthought.com) with HTTP; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 04:27:11 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 04:27:11 -0800
From: "Scott G. Kelly" <scott@hyperthought.com>
To: "secdir@ietf.org" <secdir@ietf.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc5066bis.all@tools.ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Type: plain
Message-ID: <1386851231.882518471@apps.rackspace.com>
X-Mailer: webmail7.0
Subject: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc5066bis-07
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 12:27:20 -0000
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. From the abstract: This document updates RFC 5066. It amends that specification by informing the internet community about the transition of the EFM-CU- MIB module from the concluded IETF Ethernet Interfaces and Hub MIB Working Group to the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 802.3 working group. The security considerations section appears to be identical to RFC5066. Given the stated purpose of the document, this seems appropriate. --Scott
- [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc50… Scott G. Kelly
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-opsawg-r… Benoit Claise
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-opsawg-r… Scott G. Kelly
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-opsawg-r… Benoit Claise
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-opsawg-r… Edward Beili