[secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-considerations-05

"Takeshi Takahashi" <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp> Tue, 02 December 2014 05:09 UTC

Return-Path: <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC6431A00DF; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 21:09:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.497
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8vyKqpjLNoNC; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 21:09:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ns1.nict.go.jp (ns1.nict.go.jp [IPv6:2001:df0:232:300::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 610E91A008A; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 21:09:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gw1.nict.go.jp (gw1 []) by ns1.nict.go.jp with ESMTP id sB259AmX012526; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 14:09:10 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail2.nict.go.jp (mail.nict.go.jp []) by gw1.nict.go.jp with ESMTP id sB259AxJ008217; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 14:09:10 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail2.nict.go.jp (localhost []) by mail2.nict.go.jp (NICT Mail) with ESMTP id 77BDF16347; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 14:09:10 +0900 (JST)
Received: from VAIO (unknown []) by mail2.nict.go.jp (NICT Mail) with ESMTP id 68BB416202; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 14:09:10 +0900 (JST)
From: "Takeshi Takahashi" <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>
To: <draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-considerations.all@tools.ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 14:09:10 +0900
Message-ID: <007b01d00dee$1b5e5950$521b0bf0$@nict.go.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdAN7XykZH0mysjmR36Ib9w2fh0nsg==
Content-Language: ja
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at zenith1
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/3kAAgbagKoAVOh2oOwrsoD3KzNY
Cc: grow-chairs@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, secdir@ietf.org
Subject: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-grow-irr-routing-policy-considerations-05
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 05:09:14 -0000


I have reviewed current version of this document as part of the security
directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

This draft covers the problems of the current IRR.
It considers problems of IRR from the standpoints of data integrity and
I feel like that this draft covers sufficient types of the problems we know
until now.
Reader can easily get a big picture of the issues.

I think this document is ready, as it is.

Thank you for writing a nice document.

Kind regards,