[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-10

Takeshi Takahashi via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Sat, 06 February 2021 02:15 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Takeshi Takahashi via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, ntp@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <161257773814.7967.4285334263331418527@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Takeshi Takahashi <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 18:15:38 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/4_GvIl1dQ10mPPdo1yoQ4k8yg2w>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ntp-yang-data-model-10

Reviewer: Takeshi Takahashi
Review result: Ready

The security consideration section is written well.
I have one minor comment.
The security consideration section discusses the necessity of access control by
referencing RFC 8341. The access control feature was also discussed in Section
5, but the section refers RFC 5905 and RFC 8519. Since they are both dealing
with the necessity of access control, it would be nicer if the security
consideration section discusses the need for access control with the same (at
least one same) reference.

[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-nt… Takeshi Takahashi via Datatracker
Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-iet… Dhruv Dhody