Re: [secdir] SecDir Review of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-ring-protection-05

[Yaacov Weingarten <[e-mail]>]

Tina, hi

Thank you for your review, and thank you for the link to the official
acronym list.

I will incorporate your suggested fixes into the new version of the
document that will be uploaded shortly.

BR,
yaacov

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:26 AM, Tina TSOU <[e-mail]>wrote:

>  Dear all,****
>
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
> These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
> directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.****
>
> ** **
>
> It is technically ready, but a few editorial suggestions are below.****
>
> ** **
>
> Typo, second-last paragraph of Section 1, last sentence:****
>
>   s/doxument/document/****
>
> ** **
>
> Editorial suggestion: introduce the abbreviations P2P and P2MP in their
> respective bullets at the beginning of Section 1.1. According to the RFC
> Editor's list of abbreviations at
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-style-guide/abbrev.expansion.txt,****
>
> these are not considered well-known, therefore need to be spelled out on
> first use. Note the capitalization, per the RFC Editor's list.****
>
> ** **
>
> In case 3. of Section 1.1, delete "that" after "operator command" in the
> first line to make it consistent with the other two cases.****
>
> ** **
>
> Section 1.2 first paragraph last sentence: the subject of the sentence is
> the singular "Requirement", hence s/are/is/ in the final line.****
>
> ** **
>
> The authors can consider whether they need to spell out LSP and LSR at the
> start of Section 1.3. Again, the RFC Editor does not consider these to be
> "well-known" abbreviations.****
>
> ** **
>
> Second paragraph below Figure 1: The last sentence begins: "Coordination
> of the switchover ..." I assume the intention here is to indicate that in
> this case operation is not so simple as the first sentence indicates. ****
>
> That should perhaps be signalled by beginning the sentence with: ****
>
> "However, coordination of the switchover ..."****
>
> ** **
>
> Sentence before Figure 7: s/complimentary/complementary/****
>
> ** **
>
> Spell out e2e in the second paragraph below Figure 8, since it is used
> once only.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Thank you,****
>
> Tina****
>



-- 
Thanx and BR,
yaacov

*Still looking for new opportunity*