[secdir] SecDir Review of draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-dpa-etal-00

Radia Perlman <radiaperlman@gmail.com> Thu, 24 January 2013 20:36 UTC

Return-Path: <radiaperlman@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C7211E80BF; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:36:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vRxzIa70bRSD; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:36:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com (mail-lb0-f169.google.com [209.85.217.169]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C9F211E809A; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:36:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id m4so6721014lbo.28 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:36:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=/LddweJ9+9FxzIb7wm7MIxjKWbV4rhsJOsTxw3/pPTQ=; b=TjIAvGuwzWnlBfNh+/bIAT90B0yNTFlh/H4jgo+lEhdNCP2aKsumZ2h5WxatJ0w711 Ny728GvoHXMklr8xhwpWfQty1AYQBvwJB0StHyu3Qk6pZ0bwuPc+9RK0Q4PTGQYkAWa1 cd/XkGNYDJwGP55Mcafd/+nZAUHVNrXMx3E4n4Z9/11QJ1uTNUtIRXBrm9MVjRV8m2qb 843bFSFN6vME72S1ZT40rCXJpn8jtGsYvmIFrpFInFjlWwxxX5uQuc6Xuruywc+cM72C YUx7iBTJ00G0XDV1x0+oOwn5R7m3vtgXufyLH0oE6c5wDnJscwtTzt+3UakQlVqwvidp MEPg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.105.17 with SMTP id gi17mr2976974lab.46.1359059797055; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:36:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.64.17 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:36:36 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:36:36 -0800
Message-ID: <CAFOuuo6E7z1R7knkJ9ZsubqkQ5agd2q7MYxgCpq1xHQvFv292Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Radia Perlman <radiaperlman@gmail.com>
To: secdir@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-dpa-etal.all@tools.ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d040892fd6e98a204d40ec4ba
Subject: [secdir] SecDir Review of draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-dpa-etal-00
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 20:36:39 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

This informational document is as straightforward as we are ever likely to
see. It is three pages long (almost squeezed into two, which I would not
have thought possible). It instructs IANA to mark two BGP path attributes
as deprecated where the corresponding documents are an RFC already
reclassified as Historic and and abandoned I-D. It's a database clean-up
with no security implications.

Radia